Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, Eschertzhuber S, Ulmer H, Keller C
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria.
Anaesthesia. 2007 Sep;62(9):913-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05142.x.
In a randomised double blind prospective study, we tested the hypothesis that postoperative pain is lower in patients who receive an ProSeal LMA laryngeal mask airway compared with a tracheal tube. One hundred consecutive female patients (ASA I-II, 18-75 years) undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery were divided into two equal-sized groups for airway management with the ProSeal LMA or tracheal tube. Anaesthesia management was identical for both groups and included induction of anaesthesia using propofol/fentanyl, and maintenance with propofol/remifentanil, muscle relaxation with rocuronium, positive pressure ventilation, gastric tube insertion, dexamethasone/tropisetron for anti-emetic prophylaxis, and diclofenac for pain prophylaxis. All types of postoperative pain were treated using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine. Patients and postoperative staff were unaware of the airway device used. Data were collected by a single blinded observer. We found that pain scores were lower for the ProSeal LMA at 2 h and 6 h but not at 24 h. Morphine requirements were lower for the ProSeal LMA by 30.4%, 30.6% and 23.3% at 2, 6 and 24 h, respectively. Nausea was less common with the ProSeal LMA than with the tracheal tube at 2 h and 6 h but not at 24 h. There were no differences in the frequency of vomiting, sore throat, dysphonia or dysphagia. We conclude that postoperative pain is lower for the ProSeal LMA than the tracheal tube in females undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
在一项随机双盲前瞻性研究中,我们检验了以下假设:与气管导管相比,接受喉罩气道(ProSeal LMA)的患者术后疼痛较轻。100例连续接受腹腔镜妇科手术的女性患者(美国麻醉医师协会分级I-II级,年龄18 - 75岁)被分为两组,每组人数相等,分别采用ProSeal LMA或气管导管进行气道管理。两组的麻醉管理相同,包括使用丙泊酚/芬太尼诱导麻醉,丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼维持麻醉,罗库溴铵进行肌肉松弛,正压通气,插入胃管,地塞米松/托烷司琼预防呕吐,双氯芬酸预防疼痛。所有类型的术后疼痛均采用静脉自控镇痛(PCA)吗啡进行治疗。患者和术后医护人员均不知道所使用的气道装置。数据由一名单盲观察者收集。我们发现,ProSeal LMA组在术后2小时和6小时的疼痛评分较低,但在24小时时并非如此。ProSeal LMA组在术后2小时、6小时和24小时的吗啡需求量分别降低了30.4%、30.6%和23.3%。在术后2小时和6小时,ProSeal LMA组恶心的发生率低于气管导管组,但在24小时时并非如此。呕吐、咽痛、声音嘶哑或吞咽困难的发生率没有差异。我们得出结论,在接受妇科腹腔镜手术的女性中,ProSeal LMA术后疼痛比气管导管轻。