Cysique Lucette A, Jin Hua, Franklin Donald R, Morgan Erin E, Shi Chuan, Yu Xin, Wu Zunyou, Taylor Michael J, Marcotte Thomas D, Letendre Scott, Ake Christopher, Grant Igor, Heaton Robert K
Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Diego, and VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California 92093-0603, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Sep;13(5):781-90. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707071007.
The HIV epidemic in China has been increasing exponentially, yet there have been no studies of the neurobehavioral effects of HIV infection in that country. Most neuroAIDS research has been conducted in Western countries using Western neuropsychological (NP) methods, and it is unclear whether these testing methods are appropriate for use in China. Twenty-eight HIV seropositive (HIV+) and twenty-three HIV seronegative (HIV-) individuals with comparable gender, age, and education distributions were recruited in Beijing and the rural Anhui province in China. Thirty-nine HIV+ and thirty-one HIV- individuals were selected from a larger U.S. cohort recruited at the HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center, in San Diego, to be matched to the Chinese sample for age, disease status, and treatment variables. The NP test battery used with the U.S. and China cohorts included instruments widely used to study HIV infection in the United States. It consisted of 14 individual test measures, each assigned to one of seven ability areas thought to be especially vulnerable to effects of HIV on the brain (i.e., verbal fluency, abstraction/executive function, speed of information processing, working memory, learning, delayed recall, and motor function). To explore the cross-cultural equivalence and validity of the NP measures, we compared our Chinese and U.S. samples on the individual tests, as well as mean scaled scores for the total battery and seven ability domains. On each NP test measure, the mean of the Chinese HIV+ group was worse than that of the HIV- group. A series of 2x2 analyses of variance involving HIV+ and HIV- groups from both countries revealed highly significant HIV effects on the Global and all Domain mean scaled scores. Country effects appeared on two of the individual ability areas, at least partly due to education differences between the two countries. Importantly, the absence of HIV-by-Country interactions suggests that the NP effects of HIV are similar in the two countries. The NP test battery that was chosen and adapted for use in this study of HIV in China appears to have good cross-cultural equivalence, but appropriate Chinese norms will be needed to identify disease-related impairment in individual Chinese people. To inform the development of such norms, a much larger study of demographic effects will be needed, especially considering the wide range of education in that country.
中国的艾滋病病毒(HIV)疫情一直在呈指数级增长,但该国尚未开展关于HIV感染对神经行为影响的研究。大多数关于神经艾滋病的研究是在西方国家使用西方神经心理学(NP)方法进行的,尚不清楚这些测试方法是否适用于中国。在中国北京和安徽省农村地区招募了28名HIV血清阳性(HIV+)个体和23名HIV血清阴性(HIV-)个体,他们在性别、年龄和教育程度分布上具有可比性。从美国圣地亚哥HIV神经行为研究中心招募的一个更大的队列中选取了39名HIV+个体和31名HIV-个体,使其在年龄、疾病状态和治疗变量方面与中国样本相匹配。用于美国和中国队列的NP测试组合包括在美国广泛用于研究HIV感染的工具。它由14项个体测试指标组成,每项指标都被归入七个被认为特别容易受到HIV对大脑影响的能力领域之一(即语言流畅性、抽象/执行功能、信息处理速度、工作记忆、学习、延迟回忆和运动功能)。为了探究NP测量方法的跨文化等效性和有效性,我们比较了中国和美国样本在个体测试以及整个测试组合和七个能力领域的平均量表分数上的差异。在每项NP测试指标上,中国HIV+组的平均值都低于HIV-组。一系列涉及来自两国的HIV+和HIV-组的2×2方差分析显示,HIV对总体和所有领域的平均量表分数有非常显著的影响。国家效应出现在两个个体能力领域,至少部分原因是两国之间的教育差异。重要的是,不存在HIV与国家的交互作用表明HIV的NP效应在两国是相似的。在这项针对中国HIV的研究中所选用和改编的NP测试组合似乎具有良好的跨文化等效性,但需要合适的中国常模来识别中国个体中与疾病相关的损伤。为了为制定此类常模提供信息,将需要开展一项规模大得多的关于人口统计学效应的研究,尤其是考虑到该国教育水平的广泛差异。