Suppr超能文献

急诊情况下距离医院的远近与患者死亡率之间的关系:一项观察性研究。

The relationship between distance to hospital and patient mortality in emergencies: an observational study.

作者信息

Nicholl Jon, West James, Goodacre Steve, Turner Janette

机构信息

Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2007 Sep;24(9):665-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.047654.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Reconfiguration of emergency services could lead to patients with life-threatening conditions travelling longer distances to hospital. Concerns have been raised that this could increase the risk of death. We aimed to determine whether distance to hospital was associated with mortality in patients with life-threatening emergencies.

METHODS

We undertook an observational cohort study of 10,315 cases transported with a potentially life-threatening condition (excluding cardiac arrests) by four English ambulance services to associated acute hospitals, to determine whether distance to hospital was associated with mortality, after adjustment for age, sex, clinical category and illness severity.

RESULTS

Straight-line ambulance journey distances ranged from 0 to 58 km with a median of 5 km, and 644 patients died (6.2%). Increased distance was associated with increased risk of death (odds ratio 1.02 per kilometre; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03; p<0.001). This association was not changed by adjustment for confounding by age, sex, clinical category or illness severity. Patients with respiratory emergencies showed the greatest association between distance and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Increased journey distance to hospital appears to be associated with increased risk of mortality. Our data suggest that a 10-km increase in straight-line distance is associated with around a 1% absolute increase in mortality.

摘要

目的

急诊服务的重新配置可能导致患有危及生命疾病的患者前往医院的路程更远。有人担心这可能会增加死亡风险。我们旨在确定前往医院的距离是否与危及生命的急诊患者的死亡率相关。

方法

我们对10315例由四家英国救护车服务机构送往相关急症医院的潜在危及生命疾病(不包括心脏骤停)患者进行了一项观察性队列研究,以确定在调整年龄、性别、临床类别和疾病严重程度后,前往医院的距离是否与死亡率相关。

结果

救护车直线行驶距离为0至58公里,中位数为5公里,644例患者死亡(6.2%)。距离增加与死亡风险增加相关(每公里比值比1.02;95%置信区间1.01至1.03;p<0.001)。在调整年龄、性别、临床类别或疾病严重程度的混杂因素后,这种关联没有改变。呼吸急症患者在距离和死亡率之间的关联最为明显。

结论

前往医院的路程增加似乎与死亡风险增加相关。我们的数据表明,直线距离增加10公里与死亡率绝对增加约1%相关。

相似文献

6
Emergency medical services response time and mortality in an urban setting.城市环境中的紧急医疗服务响应时间与死亡率。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;16(1):142-51. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.614046. Epub 2011 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

5
The Future of the Irish Nursing Home Landscape.爱尔兰养老院格局的未来。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):e80605. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80605. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Volume and outcome: the more patients the better?数量与结果:患者越多越好?
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):657-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.04.012. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
2
Prediction of mortality among emergency medical admissions.急诊入院患者死亡率的预测
Emerg Med J. 2006 May;23(5):372-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.028522.
9
Health service accessibility and deaths from asthma.医疗服务可及性与哮喘死亡
Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;28(1):101-5. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.1.101.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验