Nicholl Jon, West James, Goodacre Steve, Turner Janette
Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Emerg Med J. 2007 Sep;24(9):665-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.047654.
Reconfiguration of emergency services could lead to patients with life-threatening conditions travelling longer distances to hospital. Concerns have been raised that this could increase the risk of death. We aimed to determine whether distance to hospital was associated with mortality in patients with life-threatening emergencies.
We undertook an observational cohort study of 10,315 cases transported with a potentially life-threatening condition (excluding cardiac arrests) by four English ambulance services to associated acute hospitals, to determine whether distance to hospital was associated with mortality, after adjustment for age, sex, clinical category and illness severity.
Straight-line ambulance journey distances ranged from 0 to 58 km with a median of 5 km, and 644 patients died (6.2%). Increased distance was associated with increased risk of death (odds ratio 1.02 per kilometre; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03; p<0.001). This association was not changed by adjustment for confounding by age, sex, clinical category or illness severity. Patients with respiratory emergencies showed the greatest association between distance and mortality.
Increased journey distance to hospital appears to be associated with increased risk of mortality. Our data suggest that a 10-km increase in straight-line distance is associated with around a 1% absolute increase in mortality.
急诊服务的重新配置可能导致患有危及生命疾病的患者前往医院的路程更远。有人担心这可能会增加死亡风险。我们旨在确定前往医院的距离是否与危及生命的急诊患者的死亡率相关。
我们对10315例由四家英国救护车服务机构送往相关急症医院的潜在危及生命疾病(不包括心脏骤停)患者进行了一项观察性队列研究,以确定在调整年龄、性别、临床类别和疾病严重程度后,前往医院的距离是否与死亡率相关。
救护车直线行驶距离为0至58公里,中位数为5公里,644例患者死亡(6.2%)。距离增加与死亡风险增加相关(每公里比值比1.02;95%置信区间1.01至1.03;p<0.001)。在调整年龄、性别、临床类别或疾病严重程度的混杂因素后,这种关联没有改变。呼吸急症患者在距离和死亡率之间的关联最为明显。
前往医院的路程增加似乎与死亡风险增加相关。我们的数据表明,直线距离增加10公里与死亡率绝对增加约1%相关。