• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术及腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术与开腹手术相比的泌尿系统并发症情况。

A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy to open abdominal surgery.

作者信息

Uccella Stefano, Laterza Rosa, Ciravolo Giuseppe, Volpi Eugenio, Franchi Massimo, Zefiro Francesca, Donadello Nicoletta, Ghezzi Fabio

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Piazza Biroldi 1, 21100 Varese, Italy.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1 Suppl 1):S147-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.027. Epub 2007 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.027
PMID:17720232
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (LPS) to total abdominal radical hysterectomy (TARH) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LPT) in terms of urinary tract lesions and postoperative urinary retention.

METHODS

Starting in 2004, we treated all early stage cervical cancer patients with TLRH and LPS. The control group for this analysis was a historical cohort of patients treated with TARH+LPT. Within the TLRH+LPS group, we assessed whether the width of parametrial tissue removed was a risk factor for urinary tract injuries or postoperative urinary retention.

RESULTS

Fifty women were included in the TLRH+LPS group and forty-eight were included in the TARH+LPT group. There were no conversions from laparoscopy to laparotomy. There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative urinary complications between the groups. Four (8%) intraoperative urinary tract injuries in the LPS (3 cystotomies and 1 ureteral lesions all repaired laparoscopically) and 2 (4.2%) in the LPT group (2 cystotomies) occurred (p=0.68). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative urinary complications between groups. Urinary postoperative complications were: 1 (2%) ureterovaginal and 1 vesicovaginal fistulas, 1 delayed ureteric fistula in LPS group vs. 0 in LPT group (p=0.24). Urinary retention was complained by 7 (14%) and 7 (14.6%) patients in LPS and LPT groups respectively (p=1.00). The average width of parametrial tissue removed in the LPS group was 32.2+14.0 mm in patients with vs. 39.5+13.6 mm in patients without urinary complications (p=0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

A laparoscopic approach is comparable to the laparotomy in terms of urinary lesions and postoperative retention. The width of parametrium removed does not affect the risk of urinary lesions or postoperative retention.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术(TLRH)及腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LPS)与经腹根治性子宫切除术(TARH)及盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LPT)在尿路损伤及术后尿潴留方面的情况。

方法

自2004年起,我们采用TLRH及LPS治疗所有早期宫颈癌患者。本分析的对照组为接受TARH+LPT治疗的历史队列患者。在TLRH+LPS组中,我们评估所切除宫旁组织的宽度是否为尿路损伤或术后尿潴留的危险因素。

结果

TLRH+LPS组纳入50名女性,TARH+LPT组纳入48名女性。无腹腔镜转为开腹手术的情况。两组术中尿路并发症无统计学显著差异。LPS组发生4例(8%)术中尿路损伤(3例膀胱切开术和1例输尿管损伤均经腹腔镜修复),LPT组发生2例(4.2%)(2例膀胱切开术)(p=0.68)。同样,两组术后尿路并发症无统计学显著差异。术后尿路并发症为:LPS组1例(2%)输尿管阴道瘘和1例膀胱阴道瘘、1例延迟性输尿管瘘,LPT组为0例(p=0.24)。LPS组和LPT组分别有7例(分别为14%和14.6%)患者主诉尿潴留(p=1.00)。LPS组有尿路并发症患者所切除宫旁组织的平均宽度为32.2+14.0mm,无尿路并发症患者为39.5+13.6mm(p=0.11)。

结论

在尿路损伤及术后尿潴留方面,腹腔镜手术方法与开腹手术相当。所切除宫旁组织的宽度不影响尿路损伤风险或术后尿潴留。

相似文献

1
A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy to open abdominal surgery.全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术及腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术与开腹手术相比的泌尿系统并发症情况。
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1 Suppl 1):S147-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.027. Epub 2007 Aug 27.
2
[Complication of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: an analysis of 23 cases].[腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术及淋巴结清扫术的并发症:23例分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Jul;40(7):438-40.
3
[Analysis of postoperative complications of radical hysterectomy for 219 cervical cancer patients].219例宫颈癌患者根治性子宫切除术后并发症分析
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2006 Apr;28(4):316-9.
4
[Clinical evaluation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer].[腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术联合盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术的临床评估]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Jul;38(7):409-11.
5
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.早期宫颈癌患者行全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术加淋巴结清扫术的对比:我们的经验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1316-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0342-7. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
6
Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌患者全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):96-102. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000268798.75353.04.
7
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study.早期子宫内膜癌全腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术加淋巴结清扫术的前瞻性随机研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jan;112(1):126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.019. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
8
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.Ib1期宫颈癌患者的全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术:手术及肿瘤学结局分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Jan;35(1):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
9
Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer.宫颈癌的腹腔镜与阴道联合根治术
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Oct;79(1):59-63. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5912.
10
A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.机器人根治性子宫切除术联合淋巴结清扫术与腹腔镜手术及开腹手术的病例对照分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jun;113(3):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Minimally Invasive Treatment Approach for Early-Stage Uterine Cervical Cancer: The Impact of the LACC Trial and a Literature Review.早期子宫颈癌的微创治疗方法:LACC试验的影响及文献综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 28;61(4):620. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040620.
2
A meta-analysis comparing open and minimally invasive cervical tumor surgery wound infection and postoperative complications.一项比较开放性与微创性宫颈肿瘤手术伤口感染及术后并发症的荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02713-8.
3
Meta-analysis reveals higher intraoperative urologic complication rates in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy.
荟萃分析显示,与腹式根治性子宫切除术相比,微创根治性子宫切除术的术中泌尿外科并发症发生率更高。
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7331-7340. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001980.
4
A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer.一项荟萃分析研究了开放式手术治疗与微创手术治疗对女性宫颈癌患者伤口感染的影响。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14535. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14535. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
5
Urologic Complication after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Gynecology Oncology: A Single-Center Analysis and Narrative Review of the Literature.妇科肿瘤腹腔镜子宫切除术后的泌尿系统并发症:单中心分析及文献回顾。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 18;58(12):1869. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121869.
6
Effect of minimally invasive surgery and laparotomy on wound infection and postoperative and intraoperative complications in the management of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.微创外科与剖腹手术治疗宫颈癌的术中及术后并发症和伤口感染的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Apr;20(4):1061-1071. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13962. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
7
Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创手术与开放手术治疗早期宫颈癌并发症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253143. eCollection 2021.
8
Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer.全腹腔镜与传统开腹腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术治疗宫颈癌的临床、手术、肿瘤学和功能结局:301 例宫颈癌患者的研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;32(1):e10. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e10. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
9
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术比腹式根治性子宫切除术有更高的围手术期泌尿系统并发症风险:38 项研究的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1509-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07366-1. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
10
Laparoscopic vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China.腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌:中国一项单机构倾向评分匹配研究
Front Oncol. 2019 Oct 30;9:1107. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01107. eCollection 2019.