Suppr超能文献

慢性危重症患者:疾病管理干预后的健康相关生活质量及资源利用情况

Chronically critically ill patients: health-related quality of life and resource use after a disease management intervention.

作者信息

Douglas Sara L, Daly Barbara J, Kelley Carol Genet, O'Toole Elizabeth, Montenegro Hugo

机构信息

School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2007 Sep;16(5):447-57.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronically critically ill patients often have high costs of care and poor outcomes and thus might benefit from a disease management program.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate how adding a disease management program to the usual care system affects outcomes after discharge from the hospital (mortality, health-related quality of life, resource use) in chronically critically ill patients.

METHODS

In a prospective experimental design, 335 intensive care patients who received more than 3 days of mechanical ventilation at a university medical center were recruited. For 8 weeks after discharge, advanced practice nurses provided an intervention that focused on case management and interdisciplinary communication to patients in the experimental group.

RESULTS

A total of 74.0% of the patients survived and completed the study. Significant predictors of death were age (P = .001), duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .001), and history of diabetes (P = .04). The disease management program did not have a significant impact on health-related quality of life; however, a greater percentage of patients in the experimental group than in the control group had "improved" physical health-related quality of life at the end of the intervention period (P = .02). The only significant effect of the intervention was a reduction in the number of days of hospital readmission and thus a reduction in charges associated with readmission.

CONCLUSION

The intervention was not associated with significant changes in any outcomes other than duration of readmission, but the supportive care coordination program could be provided without increasing overall charges.

摘要

背景

慢性危重病患者通常护理成本高且预后差,因此可能从疾病管理项目中获益。

目的

评估在常规护理体系中增加疾病管理项目对慢性危重病患者出院后结局(死亡率、健康相关生活质量、资源利用)的影响。

方法

采用前瞻性实验设计,招募了一所大学医学中心接受机械通气超过3天的335名重症监护患者。出院后8周,高级执业护士对实验组患者提供了一项侧重于病例管理和跨学科沟通的干预措施。

结果

共有74.0%的患者存活并完成了研究。死亡的显著预测因素为年龄(P = 0.001)、机械通气时间(P = 0.001)和糖尿病史(P = 0.04)。疾病管理项目对健康相关生活质量没有显著影响;然而,在干预期结束时,实验组中“改善”了身体健康相关生活质量的患者百分比高于对照组(P = 0.02)。干预的唯一显著效果是减少了再次入院天数,从而降低了与再次入院相关的费用。

结论

除了再次入院时间外,干预与任何结局的显著变化均无关联,但可以在不增加总体费用的情况下提供支持性护理协调项目。

相似文献

3
Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) for critically ill adults in the intensive care unit.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 27;3(3):CD010754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010754.pub2.
4
7
Age differences in survival outcomes and resource use for chronically critically ill patients.
J Crit Care. 2009 Jun;24(2):302-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 May 14.
9
Composite outcomes of chronically critically ill patients 4 months after hospital discharge.
Am J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;18(5):456-64; quiz 465. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009580.

引用本文的文献

3
Post-intensive care syndrome follow-up system after hospital discharge: a narrative review.
J Intensive Care. 2024 Jan 12;12(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00716-w.
6
Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): recent updates.
J Intensive Care. 2023 May 23;11(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00670-7.
7
Critically ill patient mortality by age: long-term follow-up (CIMbA-LT).
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Feb 11;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01102-3.
8
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
10
Improving Quality of Life in Patients at Risk for Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018 Nov 26;2(4):359-369. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.10.001. eCollection 2018 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Return on investment in disease management: a review.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2005 Summer;26(4):1-19.
5
8
Economic effectiveness of disease management programs: a meta-analysis.
Dis Manag. 2005 Apr;8(2):114-34. doi: 10.1089/dis.2005.8.114.
10
Get with the guidelines for cardiovascular secondary prevention: pilot results.
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jan 26;164(2):203-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.2.203.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验