Douglas Sara L, Daly Barbara J, Kelley Carol Genet, O'Toole Elizabeth, Montenegro Hugo
School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Am J Crit Care. 2007 Sep;16(5):447-57.
Chronically critically ill patients often have high costs of care and poor outcomes and thus might benefit from a disease management program.
To evaluate how adding a disease management program to the usual care system affects outcomes after discharge from the hospital (mortality, health-related quality of life, resource use) in chronically critically ill patients.
In a prospective experimental design, 335 intensive care patients who received more than 3 days of mechanical ventilation at a university medical center were recruited. For 8 weeks after discharge, advanced practice nurses provided an intervention that focused on case management and interdisciplinary communication to patients in the experimental group.
A total of 74.0% of the patients survived and completed the study. Significant predictors of death were age (P = .001), duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .001), and history of diabetes (P = .04). The disease management program did not have a significant impact on health-related quality of life; however, a greater percentage of patients in the experimental group than in the control group had "improved" physical health-related quality of life at the end of the intervention period (P = .02). The only significant effect of the intervention was a reduction in the number of days of hospital readmission and thus a reduction in charges associated with readmission.
The intervention was not associated with significant changes in any outcomes other than duration of readmission, but the supportive care coordination program could be provided without increasing overall charges.
慢性危重病患者通常护理成本高且预后差,因此可能从疾病管理项目中获益。
评估在常规护理体系中增加疾病管理项目对慢性危重病患者出院后结局(死亡率、健康相关生活质量、资源利用)的影响。
采用前瞻性实验设计,招募了一所大学医学中心接受机械通气超过3天的335名重症监护患者。出院后8周,高级执业护士对实验组患者提供了一项侧重于病例管理和跨学科沟通的干预措施。
共有74.0%的患者存活并完成了研究。死亡的显著预测因素为年龄(P = 0.001)、机械通气时间(P = 0.001)和糖尿病史(P = 0.04)。疾病管理项目对健康相关生活质量没有显著影响;然而,在干预期结束时,实验组中“改善”了身体健康相关生活质量的患者百分比高于对照组(P = 0.02)。干预的唯一显著效果是减少了再次入院天数,从而降低了与再次入院相关的费用。
除了再次入院时间外,干预与任何结局的显著变化均无关联,但可以在不增加总体费用的情况下提供支持性护理协调项目。