• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病管理的投资回报率:综述

Return on investment in disease management: a review.

作者信息

Goetzel Ron Z, Ozminkowski Ronald J, Villagra Victor G, Duffy Jennifer

机构信息

Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Cornell University Institute for Policy Research, Medstat, Washington, DC 20008, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 2005 Summer;26(4):1-19.

PMID:17288065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4194913/
Abstract

The results of 44 studies investigating financial impact and return on investment (ROI) from disease management (DM) programs for asthma, congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, depression, and multiple illnesses were examined. A positive ROI was found for programs directed at CHF and multiple disease conditions. Some evidence suggests that diabetes programs may save more than they cost, but additional studies are needed. Results are mixed for asthma management programs. Depression management programs cost more than they save in medical expenses, but may save money when considering productivity outcomes.

摘要

对44项研究的结果进行了审查,这些研究调查了针对哮喘、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、糖尿病、抑郁症和多种疾病的疾病管理(DM)项目的财务影响和投资回报率(ROI)。针对CHF和多种疾病状况的项目发现了正的投资回报率。一些证据表明,糖尿病项目可能节省的费用超过其成本,但还需要更多研究。哮喘管理项目的结果好坏参半。抑郁症管理项目在医疗费用方面成本高于节省的费用,但在考虑生产力成果时可能节省资金。

相似文献

1
Return on investment in disease management: a review.疾病管理的投资回报率:综述
Health Care Financ Rev. 2005 Summer;26(4):1-19.
2
Implementation and outcomes of commercial disease management programs in the United States: the disease management outcomes consolidation survey.美国商业疾病管理项目的实施情况与成果:疾病管理成果综合调查
Dis Manag. 2005 Aug;8(4):253-64. doi: 10.1089/dis.2005.8.253.
3
Disease management practices of health plans.健康计划的疾病管理实践。
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Apr;8(4):353-61.
4
Evaluation of four disease management programs: evidence from blue cross blue shield of Louisiana.四种疾病管理项目的评估:来自路易斯安那州蓝十字蓝盾的证据。
J Med Econ. 2020 Jun;23(6):557-565. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1722677. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
Measuring the economic value of HMOs.衡量健康维护组织的经济价值。
Benefits Q. 1995;11(2):16-8.
6
Do employee health management programs work?员工健康管理计划有效吗?
Am J Health Promot. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(4):1-8, iii. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.23.4.tahp.
7
What can a pilot congestive heart failure disease management program tell us about likely return on investment?: A case study from a program offered to federal employees.飞行员充血性心力衰竭疾病管理项目能让我们了解到哪些可能的投资回报?:一项针对联邦雇员项目的案例研究。
Dis Manag. 2005 Dec;8(6):346-60. doi: 10.1089/dis.2005.8.346.
8
A truly healthy bottom line: improving financial results through effective health and productivity programs.真正健康的底线:通过有效的健康与生产力计划提升财务业绩。
Benefits Q. 2008;24(2):7-11.
9
Well-managed care. Predictive modeling helps keep high-risk patients from becoming high-cost patients.管理良好的医疗保健。预测模型有助于防止高风险患者成为高成本患者。
Healthc Inform. 2004 Aug;21(8):27-8.
10
Data warehousing improves care, demonstrates return on investment.数据仓库改善医疗服务,证明投资回报率。
J AHIMA. 2001 Sep;72(8):69-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of a Complex Care Program for High-Cost/High-Need Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study.高成本/高需求患者复杂护理方案的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2021-2029. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06676-x. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Leveraging Delivery of Blood Pressure Control Interventions among Low-income African American Adults: Opportunities to Increase Social Support and Produce Family-level Behavior Change.利用血压控制干预措施在低收入非裔美国成年人中的实施机会:增加社会支持并产生家庭层面行为改变。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Oct 17;29(4):549-558. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.4.549. eCollection 2019 Fall.
3
Development of a wellness trust to improve population health: Case-study of a United States urban center.建立健康信托以改善人群健康:美国一个城市中心的案例研究
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Mar 21;10:292-298. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.03.009. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
Improving medication adherence: a framework for community pharmacy-based interventions.提高药物治疗依从性:基于社区药房干预措施的框架
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2015 Nov 16;4:175-183. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S93036. eCollection 2015.
5
Impact of primary care funding on secondary care utilisation and patient outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional study of English general practice.基层医疗经费对二级医疗服务利用和患者结局的影响:一项对英国普通实践的回顾性横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Nov;67(664):e792-e799. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693101. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
6
Costs and savings associated with a pharmacists prescribing for minor ailments program in Saskatchewan.萨斯喀彻温省药剂师诊治小病项目的成本与节省情况。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017 Apr 11;15:3. doi: 10.1186/s12962-017-0066-7. eCollection 2017.
7
Quantifying the costs and benefits of occupational health and safety interventions at a Bangladesh shipbuilding company.量化孟加拉国一家造船公司职业健康与安全干预措施的成本和收益。
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2015;21(2):127-36. doi: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000100. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
8
Aligning policy to promote cascade genetic screening for prevention and early diagnosis of heritable diseases.调整政策以促进级联遗传筛查,用于遗传性疾病的预防和早期诊断。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Jun;24(3):388-99. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9805-5. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
9
The Charlson comorbidity index can be used prospectively to identify patients who will incur high future costs.查尔森合并症指数可用于前瞻性地识别未来将产生高额费用的患者。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e112479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112479. eCollection 2014.
10
[Economic evaluation of a program of coordination between levels for complex chronic patients' management].[复杂慢性病患者管理分层协调项目的经济评估]
Aten Primaria. 2015 Mar;47(3):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
What can a pilot congestive heart failure disease management program tell us about likely return on investment?: A case study from a program offered to federal employees.飞行员充血性心力衰竭疾病管理项目能让我们了解到哪些可能的投资回报?:一项针对联邦雇员项目的案例研究。
Dis Manag. 2005 Dec;8(6):346-60. doi: 10.1089/dis.2005.8.346.
2
Population-based disease management under fee-for-service Medicare.基于人群的疾病管理在按服务收费的医疗保险制度下。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-342-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.342.
3
Disease management: a leap of faith to lower-cost, higher-quality health care.疾病管理:对低成本、高质量医疗保健的信念飞跃。
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2003 Oct(69):1-4.
4
The health and productivity cost burden of the "top 10" physical and mental health conditions affecting six large U.S. employers in 1999.1999年影响美国六大雇主的“十大”身心健康状况所带来的健康与生产力成本负担。
J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jan;45(1):5-14. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200301000-00007.
5
Costs associated with the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the diabetes prevention program.糖尿病预防计划中与2型糖尿病一级预防相关的成本。
Diabetes Care. 2003 Jan;26(1):36-47. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.1.36.
6
Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness-which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports.用于慢性病患者疾病管理项目的干预措施——哪些有效?已发表报告的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2002 Oct 26;325(7370):925. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.925.
7
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.改善慢性病患者的初级保健:慢性病照护模式,第2部分。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1909-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1909.
8
Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis.增加成人免疫接种和癌症筛查服务使用的干预措施:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 May 7;136(9):641-51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-9-200205070-00006.
9
The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review.糖尿病患者疾病与病例管理的有效性:一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4 Suppl):15-38. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00423-3.
10
The business case for quality mental health services: why employers should care about the mental health and well-being of their employees.优质心理健康服务的商业案例:雇主为何应关注员工的心理健康与福祉。
J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Apr;44(4):320-30. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200204000-00012.