• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经典条件反射中的试验和试验间隔时长:学习与表现问题

Trial and intertrial durations in Pavlovian conditioning: issues of learning and performance.

作者信息

Lattal K M

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, 3740 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999 Oct;25(4):433-50. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.25.4.433.

DOI:10.1037/0097-7403.25.4.433
PMID:17763570
Abstract

Four experiments assessed the effects of trial (T) and intertrial (I) durations on magazine approach behavior in rats. In Experiments 1 and 2, different groups of animals were conditioned with various combinations of I and T durations. The rate of acquisition, in terms of the number of trials required to reach various acquisition criteria, generally was faster in groups trained with large I:T ratios. There also were differences in rate of acquisition and terminal response rates between groups trained with identical I:T ratios but with different absolute I and T durations. Differences evident at the end of conditioning persisted during a common test with various combinations of I and T durations. Experiments 3 and 4 provided a more specific test of the predictions of 2 general classes of theories and found results that were consistent with those theories that characterize group differences as indicative of differences in learning, rather than in performance.

摘要

四项实验评估了试验(T)时长和试验间期(I)时长对大鼠接近食盒行为的影响。在实验1和实验2中,不同组的动物接受了不同I和T时长组合的条件训练。就达到不同习得标准所需的试验次数而言,习得速率在接受大I:T比值训练的组中通常更快。在接受相同I:T比值但绝对I和T时长不同的组之间,习得速率和最终反应速率也存在差异。在条件训练结束时明显的差异在随后使用不同I和T时长组合的共同测试中依然存在。实验3和实验4对两类一般理论的预测进行了更具体的检验,结果与那些将组间差异表征为学习差异而非表现差异的理论一致。

相似文献

1
Trial and intertrial durations in Pavlovian conditioning: issues of learning and performance.经典条件反射中的试验和试验间隔时长:学习与表现问题
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999 Oct;25(4):433-50. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.25.4.433.
2
Acquisition with partial and continuous reinforcement in rat magazine approach.大鼠食物盘接近实验中部分强化和连续强化的习得
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jul;31(3):319-33. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.3.319.
3
Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning.在食物信号出现时的趋近行为取决于巴甫洛夫式条件作用,而非工具性条件作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Apr;39(2):107-16. doi: 10.1037/a0031315. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
4
Pavlovian conditioning under partial reinforcement: The effects of nonreinforced trials versus cumulative conditioned stimulus duration.部分强化条件作用下的巴甫洛夫条件反射:非强化试验与累积条件刺激时长的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Jul;46(3):256-272. doi: 10.1037/xan0000242. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Occasion setting in Pavlovian ambiguous target discriminations.巴甫洛夫式模糊目标辨别中的情境设定
Behav Processes. 2008 Nov;79(3):132-47. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
6
Effects of conditioned stimulus (CS) duration, intertrial interval, and I/T ratio on appetitive Pavlovian conditioning.条件刺激(CS)持续时间、试验间间隔和 I/T 比率对食欲性巴甫洛夫条件反射的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Jul;46(3):243-255. doi: 10.1037/xan0000241. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
7
Pavlovian contingencies and temporal information.巴甫洛夫条件反射与时间信息。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jul;32(3):284-94. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.3.284.
8
The dynamics of conditioning and extinction.条件作用与消退的动态变化。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Oct;35(4):447-72. doi: 10.1037/a0015626.
9
Within-subject effects of number of trials in rat conditioning procedures.大鼠条件反射程序中试验次数的受试者内效应。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):217-31. doi: 10.1037/a0016425.
10
A comparator view of Pavlovian and differential inhibition.巴甫洛夫式抑制与差别抑制的比较观点。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jul;32(3):271-83. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.3.271.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Pretraining on Autoshaping and Operant Acquisition in Rats is Significant but Transient.预训练对大鼠自动成型和操作性习得的影响显著但短暂。
Learn Motiv. 2025 May;90. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102112. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
2
Beyond reconsolidation: The need for a broad theoretical approach in clinical translations of research on retrieval-induced plasticity.超越再巩固:在检索诱发可塑性研究的临床转化中需要一种广泛的理论方法。
Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;138(4):272-280. doi: 10.1037/bne0000602.
3
Time-scale invariant contingency yields one-shot reinforcement learning despite extremely long delays to reinforcement.
时间不变协变量尽管强化延迟非常长,但仍能产生单次强化学习。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 23;121(30):e2405451121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405451121. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
4
Cue duration and trial spacing effects in contingency assessment in the streaming procedure with humans.线索时长和试验间隔效应对人类连续过程中应急评估的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2024 Apr;50(2):99-117. doi: 10.1037/xan0000376.
5
Pavlovian learning and conditioned reinforcement.巴甫洛夫式学习和条件强化。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jun;56(3):498-519. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1004. Epub 2023 May 31.
6
Reward timescale controls the rate of behavioural and dopaminergic learning.奖赏时间尺度控制行为和多巴胺能学习的速率。
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 6:2023.03.31.535173. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.31.535173.
7
Average reward rates enable motivational transfer across independent reinforcement learning tasks.平均奖励率能够实现跨独立强化学习任务的动机转移。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Nov 9;16:1041566. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1041566. eCollection 2022.
8
Reinforcement rate and the balance between excitatory and inhibitory learning: Insights from deletion of the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit.增强率与兴奋性和抑制性学习之间的平衡:GluA1 AMPA 受体亚基缺失的启示。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Oct;48(4):307-314. doi: 10.1037/xan0000336.
9
Time will tell: Temporal processing in the sexual behavior system.时间会证明一切:性行为系统中的时间加工。
Learn Behav. 2022 Sep;50(3):273-282. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00533-5. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
10
How do real animals account for the passage of time during associative learning?真实动物在联想学习过程中如何感知时间的流逝?
Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct;136(5):383-391. doi: 10.1037/bne0000516. Epub 2022 Apr 28.