Newman Sarah M, Paletz Elliott M, Rattenborg Niels C, Obermeyer William H, Benca Ruth M
Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 6001 Research Park Boulevard, Madison WI 53719, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2008 Jan 28;93(1-2):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.07.012. Epub 2007 Aug 2.
A well-defined sleep deprivation (SD) syndrome has been observed in studies with rats under conditions of severe sleep loss on the Disk-Over-Water (DOW) apparatus. Observation of the sleep deprivation syndrome across taxa would assist in the elucidation of the function of sleep. In the present study, the effects of total sleep deprivation were assessed in pigeons, a biologically relevant choice given that birds are the only non-mammalian taxon known to exhibit unequivocal rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep and non-REM (NREM) sleep. Pigeons were deprived of sleep for 24-29 days on the DOW by rotating the disk and requiring them to walk whenever sleep was initiated. Control (C) birds were also housed on the DOW and required to walk only when the deprived (D) birds were required to walk due to sleep initiation. NREM and REM sleep amounts were reduced from baseline during the deprivation for both D and C birds, although D birds obtained less NREM sleep than controls. Across the deprivation, D birds had their total sleep reduced by 54% of baseline (scored in 4 s epochs), whereas previous studies in rats on the DOW reported total sleep reduction of as much as 91% (scored in 30 s epochs). Pigeons proved to be more resistant to sleep deprivation by the DOW method and were much more difficult to deprive over the course of the experiment. Overall, the pigeons showed recovery sleep patterns similar to those seen in rats; i.e., rebound sleep during recovery was disproportionately composed of REM sleep. They did not, however, show the obvious external physical signs of the SD syndrome nor the large metabolic and thermoregulatory changes associated with the syndrome. The DOW method was thus effective in producing sleep loss in the pigeon, but was not as effective as it is in rats. The absence of the full SD syndrome is discussed in the context of limitations of the DOW apparatus and the possibility of species-specific adaptations that birds may possess to withstand or adapt to conditions of limited sleep opportunity.
在使用水盘上圆盘(DOW)装置使大鼠处于严重睡眠缺失条件的研究中,已观察到一种明确的睡眠剥夺(SD)综合征。跨分类群观察睡眠剥夺综合征将有助于阐明睡眠的功能。在本研究中,评估了对鸽子进行完全睡眠剥夺的影响,选择鸽子具有生物学相关性,因为鸟类是已知唯一表现出明确快速眼动(REM)睡眠和非快速眼动(NREM)睡眠的非哺乳类分类群。通过旋转圆盘并要求鸽子在每次开始睡眠时行走,使其在DOW上睡眠剥夺24 - 29天。对照(C)组鸟类也饲养在DOW上,仅在剥夺(D)组鸟类因开始睡眠而需要行走时才要求其行走。在剥夺期间,D组和C组鸟类的NREM和REM睡眠量均从基线水平降低,尽管D组鸟类获得的NREM睡眠比对照组少。在整个剥夺过程中,D组鸟类的总睡眠时间比基线减少了54%(以4秒时段计分),而之前在大鼠上使用DOW装置的研究报告总睡眠时间减少高达91%(以30秒时段计分)。事实证明,鸽子对DOW方法导致的睡眠剥夺更具抵抗力,并且在实验过程中更难被剥夺睡眠。总体而言,鸽子表现出与大鼠相似的恢复睡眠模式;即恢复期间的反弹睡眠中REM睡眠占比过高。然而,它们并未表现出SD综合征明显的外部身体迹象,也未出现与该综合征相关的巨大代谢和体温调节变化。因此,DOW方法在使鸽子睡眠缺失方面是有效的,但不如对大鼠有效。在讨论DOW装置的局限性以及鸟类可能拥有的特定物种适应性以耐受或适应有限睡眠机会条件的背景下,探讨了完全SD综合征缺失的情况。