California Health Sciences University, College of Pharmacy, Clovis, California.
Pacific University Oregon, College of Health Professions, School of Pharmacy, Hillsboro, Oregon.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Apr;83(3):6554. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6554.
To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a structured model for reflective journal writing (RJW) and a grading rubric as part of a student portfolio designed to help Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students create actionable goals. A structured, eight-domain format was developed to engage students in prioritization, identification, exploration, recollection, evaluation, and challenging/solidifying their own knowledge, while assembling an action plan for development (abbreviated using the acronym PIE-RECAP). After completing RJW using this model, students self-identified domains established by the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) that corresponded to their entries. A grading rubric was designed and normalized to require minimal training for use. RJW and other elements of student portfolios were implemented simultaneously across three cohorts (N=296). Twenty-one faculty and staff graders each evaluated 10 to 15 student journal entries. Of 771 journal entries, 648 (84%) met expectations, while 123 (16%) needed to be rewritten. Students identified experiences that were meaningful to them and shared in their RJW entry the knowledge and/or information that they did not know prior to the experience. Common themes identified in the students' RJWs included: curricular experiences (12.7%), cocurricular experiences (18.4%), and experiential training (68.6%). The PIE-RECAP method can be used to guide students in RJW and identify CAPE domains in their personal and professional experiences in pharmacy school. The associated grading rubric can be used to evaluate students' RJW entries and assess their growth in curricular, cocurricular and affective domains relative to their progression.
为了开发和评估一种结构化的反思性期刊写作 (RJW) 模型和评分细则的有效性,作为学生档案的一部分,旨在帮助药学博士 (PharmD) 学生制定可操作的目标。 开发了一种结构化的、包含八个领域的格式,以帮助学生确定优先级、识别、探索、回忆、评估和挑战/巩固自己的知识,同时为发展制定行动计划(缩写为 PIE-RECAP)。学生使用该模型完成 RJW 后,会自行确定与他们的条目相对应的、由药学教育促进中心 (CAPE) 确定的领域。设计了一个评分细则并进行了标准化,以使其在使用时无需进行过多培训。RJW 和学生档案的其他元素同时在三个队列(N=296)中实施。21 名教师和工作人员评估员每人评估 10 到 15 名学生的期刊条目。 在 771 篇期刊条目中,有 648 篇(84%)符合期望,而 123 篇(16%)需要重写。学生确定了对他们有意义的经验,并在他们的 RJW 条目中分享了他们在经验之前不知道的知识和/或信息。学生在 RJW 中确定的共同主题包括:课程经验(12.7%)、课外活动经验(18.4%)和体验式培训(68.6%)。PIE-RECAP 方法可用于指导学生进行 RJW,并在他们的药学专业学习的个人和专业经验中识别 CAPE 领域。相关的评分细则可用于评估学生的 RJW 条目,并评估他们在课程、课外活动和情感领域相对于他们的进步而取得的成长。