Suppr超能文献

培养的上皮自体移植:18例患者的三年临床经验

Cultured epithelial autografts: three years of clinical experience with eighteen patients.

作者信息

Clugston P A, Snelling C F, Macdonald I B, Maledy H L, Boyle J C, Germann E, Courtemanche A D, Wirtz P, Fitzpatrick D J, Kester D A

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1991 Nov-Dec;12(6):533-9.

PMID:1779007
Abstract

Eighteen patients with major burns (mean total body surface area burned was 49% and mean total body surface area with full-thickness burns was 38%) had cultured epithelial autografts applied to 2% to 35% of the body surface area. In six patients successful "take" of greater than 65% occurred, and in 12 patients less than 40% "take" occurred. Most wounds underwent early excision to subcutaneous fat or fascia, and the wounds of 16 patients had been treated previously with homograft. Cultured epithelial autografts were covered with either single or multilayered dressings. Perioperative wound cultures showed that all patients had microorganisms, and appropriate perioperative antibiotic coverage of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was noted less frequently in the poor take group, which may have influenced subsequent cultured epithelial allograft take. Adherence and stability of cultured epithelial allografts lag behind adherence and stability of meshed split-thickness autograft. The anterior trunk and thighs are the best recipient sites. The number of autograft harvests that were required to close wounds and the length of hospital stay were not significantly decreased by the use of cultured epithelial allografts as compared with comparable full-thickness burns that were treated previously without cultured epithelial allografts. Presently, grafting with cultured epithelial allografts is an adjunct but not an alternative to conventional burn-wound coverage with split-thickness autograft, because engraftment is inconsistent.

摘要

18例重度烧伤患者(平均烧伤总面积为49%,平均全层烧伤总面积为38%)接受了培养的上皮自体移植,移植面积占体表面积的2%至35%。6例患者移植成功率超过65%,12例患者移植成功率低于40%。大多数伤口早期切除至皮下脂肪或筋膜,16例患者的伤口此前接受过同种异体移植治疗。培养的上皮自体移植覆盖单层或多层敷料。围手术期伤口培养显示所有患者均有微生物存在,在移植成功率低的组中,针对表皮葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的围手术期适当抗生素覆盖较少,这可能影响了随后培养的上皮异体移植的成功率。培养的上皮异体移植的黏附性和稳定性落后于网状中厚自体皮移植的黏附性和稳定性。前躯干和大腿是最佳受区。与之前未使用培养的上皮异体移植治疗的类似全层烧伤相比,使用培养的上皮异体移植并没有显著减少闭合伤口所需的自体皮采集次数和住院时间。目前,培养的上皮异体移植是一种辅助手段,而非传统中厚自体皮烧伤创面覆盖的替代方法,因为移植成功率并不稳定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验