Suppr超能文献

培养的上皮自体移植:28例患者的五年临床经验。

Cultured epithelial autograft: five years of clinical experience with twenty-eight patients.

作者信息

Williamson J S, Snelling C F, Clugston P, Macdonald I B, Germann E

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1995 Aug;39(2):309-19. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199508000-00020.

Abstract

Cultured epithelial autograft (CEA) has been used as an adjunct in burn wound coverage at the Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre since 1988, and has been available to all patients admitted with significant burn injuries. During the 5-year period from 1988 to 1992 inclusive, 28 patients treated with CEA survived long enough for assessment. The mean age was 35.3 years with a mean total body surface area burn of 52.2% and a mean total full thickness injury of 42.4%. CEA was applied to wounds covering between 2% and 35% body surface area (BSA; mean 10.4%) after excision to fat or fascia. Most wounds had interim homograft coverage. Preservation of homograft dermis was attempted in three patients at the time of removal without effect. The mean CEA "take" was 26.9% of the grafted area. Eight patients had 50% or greater take and were discharged with between 1 and 19% BSA covered with CEA. Thirteen patients had no take on wounds between 2 and 16% BSA. Overall mortality in burn patients treated at the Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre from 1988 to 1992 was not significantly different from 1983 to 1987 with the populations being similar in terms of total BSA burns, age, inhalation injury, and homograft availability. When compared to a matched control population from the preceding 5 years, when CEA was not available, there was no significant difference in duration of hospital stay or number of autograft harvests. However, approximately one more debridement without autograft harvest per CEA patient occurred. Timing and depth of wound excision, interim coverage, type of dressing, and wound microbiology were not found to influence good versus poor take. The anterior trunk and thighs were the best recipient sites. Subjective differences between CEA and meshed autograft were noted. The results show that after 5 years of use, CEA engraftment continues to be unpredictable and inconsistent, and hence, it should be used as only a biologic dressing and experimental adjunct to conventional burn wound coverage with split thickness autograft.

摘要

自1988年以来,培养上皮自体移植(CEA)在温哥华医院和健康科学中心一直被用作烧伤创面覆盖的辅助手段,所有因严重烧伤入院的患者均可使用。在1988年至1992年这5年期间,28例接受CEA治疗的患者存活时间足够长,可以进行评估。平均年龄为35.3岁,平均烧伤总面积为52.2%,平均全层损伤面积为42.4%。在切除至脂肪或筋膜后,将CEA应用于覆盖2%至35%体表面积(BSA;平均10.4%)的创面。大多数创面有临时同种异体皮覆盖。3例患者在去除同种异体皮时尝试保留其真皮,但未成功。CEA的平均“成活率”为移植面积的26.9%。8例患者的成活率达到50%或更高,出院时CEA覆盖的体表面积为1%至19%。13例患者在2%至16%体表面积的创面上CEA未成活。1988年至1992年在温哥华医院和健康科学中心接受治疗的烧伤患者的总体死亡率与1983年至1987年相比无显著差异,两组人群在烧伤总面积、年龄、吸入性损伤和同种异体皮可用性方面相似。与前5年未使用CEA时的匹配对照人群相比,住院时间和自体皮采集次数无显著差异。然而,每位接受CEA治疗的患者大约多进行了一次未采集自体皮的清创。未发现创面切除的时间和深度、临时覆盖、敷料类型及创面微生物学对成活率的高低有影响。前躯干和大腿是最佳的受区部位。注意到CEA与网状自体皮之间存在主观差异。结果表明,使用5年后,CEA的植入仍然不可预测且不稳定,因此,它仅应作为一种生物敷料和传统的中厚自体皮烧伤创面覆盖的实验辅助手段。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验