Weiser Mark, Reichenberg Abraham, Kravitz Efrat, Lubin Gad, Shmushkevich Moti, Glahn David C, Gross Raz, Rabinowitz Jonathan, Noy Shlomo, Davidson Michael
Department of Psychiatry, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Mar 15;63(6):602-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.029. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
Previous studies have reported that as a group, individuals affected by psychotic and nonpsychotic disorders perform below norms on cognitive tests. Other studies have indicated that unaffected siblings of individuals affected by psychotic disorders also perform below norms on the same tests. We investigated cognitive performance on a large, population-based sample of individuals, affected at the time of testing by nonpsychotic disorders, and their unaffected siblings.
Subjects were taken from a population-based cohort of 523,375, 16- to 17-year-old male adolescents who had been assessed by the Israeli Draft Board. Cognitive test scores were examined in sib-pairs discordant for nonpsychotic (n = 19,489) and psychotic (n = 888) disorders and compared with 224,082 individuals from sibships with no evidence of mental illness.
There appears to be a gradient in cognitive performance (worst to best) from individuals currently affected by psychotic illnesses (Cohen's d = -.82), followed by individuals currently affected by nonpsychotic illness (Cohen's d = -.58), unaffected siblings of individuals affected by psychotic illness (Cohen's d = -.37), unaffected siblings of individuals affected by nonpsychotic illness (Cohen's d = -.27), and members of sibships with no evidence of mental illness. Unaffected siblings of both psychotic and nonpsychotic individuals from multiple affected sibships (more then one affected sibling) had worse cognitive test scores compared with unaffected siblings from simplex sibships (only one affected sibling).
The results support, but do not prove, the notion that cognitive impairment in psychiatric disorders is familial and cuts across diagnostic entities.
既往研究报道,作为一个群体,患有精神性疾病和非精神性疾病的个体在认知测试中的表现低于正常水平。其他研究表明,患有精神性疾病个体的未患病同胞在相同测试中的表现也低于正常水平。我们在一个基于人群的大样本个体中调查了认知表现,这些个体在测试时患有非精神性疾病,以及他们未患病的同胞。
研究对象来自一个基于人群的队列,该队列包含523375名16至17岁的男性青少年,他们曾接受以色列征兵委员会的评估。对非精神性疾病(n = 19489)和精神性疾病(n = 888)不一致的同胞对的认知测试分数进行了检查,并与224082名无精神疾病证据的同胞家庭中的个体进行了比较。
认知表现似乎存在一个梯度(从最差到最好),依次为目前患有精神性疾病的个体(科恩d值 = -0.82),其次是目前患有非精神性疾病的个体(科恩d值 = -0.58),患有精神性疾病个体的未患病同胞(科恩d值 = -0.37),患有非精神性疾病个体的未患病同胞(科恩d值 = -0.27),以及无精神疾病证据的同胞家庭中的成员。与单发病同胞家庭(只有一名患病同胞)的未患病同胞相比,来自多个患病同胞家庭(不止一名患病同胞)的精神性和非精神性个体的未患病同胞的认知测试分数更差。
研究结果支持但未证明精神疾病中的认知损害具有家族性且跨越诊断实体这一观点。