• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝内淋巴浸润可独立预测结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术后的不良生存和复发情况。

Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion independently predicts poor survival and recurrences after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.

作者信息

Korita Pavel V, Wakai Toshifumi, Shirai Yoshio, Sakata Jun, Takizawa Kazuyasu, Cruz Pauldion V, Ajioka Yoichi, Hatakeyama Katsuyoshi

机构信息

Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, 951-8510, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;14(12):3472-80. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9594-2. Epub 2007 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-007-9594-2
PMID:17828431
Abstract

BACKGROUND

D2-40 monoclonal antibody immunoreactivity is specific for lymphatic endothelium and therefore provides a marker of lymphatic invasion. We hypothesized that intrahepatic lymphatic invasion reflects the nodal status of colorectal carcinoma liver metastases and may function as an adverse prognostic factor.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 105 consecutive patients who underwent resection for colorectal carcinoma liver metastases was conducted. Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion was declared when either single tumor cells or cell clusters were clearly visible within vessels that showed immunoreactivity for D2-40 monoclonal antibody. The median follow-up time was 124 months.

RESULTS

Of 105 patients, 13 were classified as having intrahepatic lymphatic invasion. All tumor foci of intrahepatic lymphatic invasion were detected within the portal tracts. Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion was significantly associated with hepatic lymph node involvement (P = 0.039). Survival after resection was significantly worse in patients with intrahepatic lymphatic invasion (median survival time of 13 months; cumulative five-year survival rate of 0%) than in patients without (median survival time of 40 months; cumulative five-year survival rate of 41%; P < 0.0001). Patients with intrahepatic lymphatic invasion also showed decreased disease-free survival rates (P < 0.0001). Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion thus independently affected both survival (relative risk, 7.666; 95% confidence interval, 3.732-15.748; P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (relative risk, 4.112; 95% confidence interval, 2.185-7.738; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion is associated with hepatic lymph node involvement and is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.

摘要

背景

D2-40单克隆抗体免疫反应对淋巴管内皮具有特异性,因此可作为淋巴管浸润的标志物。我们推测肝内淋巴管浸润反映了结直肠癌肝转移的淋巴结状态,可能是一个不良预后因素。

方法

对105例连续接受结直肠癌肝转移切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。当在对D2-40单克隆抗体呈免疫反应的血管内清晰可见单个肿瘤细胞或细胞簇时,判定为肝内淋巴管浸润。中位随访时间为124个月。

结果

105例患者中,13例被判定有肝内淋巴管浸润。所有肝内淋巴管浸润的肿瘤灶均在门静脉区域内被检测到。肝内淋巴管浸润与肝淋巴结受累显著相关(P = 0.039)。有肝内淋巴管浸润的患者切除术后生存率显著低于无肝内淋巴管浸润的患者(中位生存时间13个月;累积五年生存率0%)(中位生存时间40个月;累积五年生存率41%;P < 0.0001)。有肝内淋巴管浸润的患者无病生存率也降低(P < 0.0001)。因此,肝内淋巴管浸润独立影响生存率(相对风险,7.666;95%置信区间,3.732 - 15.748;P < 0.001)和无病生存率(相对风险,4.112;95%置信区间,2.185 - 7.738;P < 0.001)。

结论

肝内淋巴管浸润与肝淋巴结受累相关,是结直肠癌肝转移患者的不良预后因素。

相似文献

1
Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion independently predicts poor survival and recurrences after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.肝内淋巴浸润可独立预测结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术后的不良生存和复发情况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;14(12):3472-80. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9594-2. Epub 2007 Sep 8.
2
Prognostic significance of intrahepatic lymphatic invasion in patients with hepatic resection due to metastases from colorectal carcinoma.结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术中肝内淋巴管侵犯的预后意义
Cancer. 2002 Jul 1;95(1):105-11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10655.
3
Appraisal of 1 cm hepatectomy margins for intrahepatic micrometastases in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastasis.评估结直肠癌肝转移患者肝内微转移灶的1厘米肝切除切缘情况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2472-81. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0023-y. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
4
Mode of hepatic spread from gallbladder carcinoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 42 hepatectomized specimens.胆囊癌肝转移模式:42 例肝切除标本的免疫组化分析。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Jan;34(1):65-74. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181c467d4.
5
Liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer in patients with concurrent extrahepatic disease: results in 127 patients treated at a single center.同期合并肝外疾病的转移性结直肠癌患者的肝切除术:单中心127例患者的治疗结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Aug;16(8):2138-46. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0521-6. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
6
Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion independently predicts poor survival and recurrences after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.肝内淋巴管侵犯可独立预测结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术后的不良生存及复发情况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;14(12):3297-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9597-z. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
7
Clinicopathological prognostic factors after hepatectomy for patients with mass-forming type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: relevance of the lymphatic invasion index.大细胞型肝内胆管细胞癌患者肝切除术后的临床病理预后因素:淋巴血管侵犯指数的相关性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul;17(7):1816-22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0929-z. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
8
Histopathologic prognostic factors in resected colorectal lung metastases.切除的结直肠癌肺转移灶的组织病理学预后因素
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jan;79(1):278-82; discussion 283. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.096.
9
Impact of microscopic hepatic lymph node involvement on survival after resection of colorectal liver metastasis.显微镜下肝门淋巴结受累对结直肠癌肝转移切除术后生存的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Jun;198(6):884-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.01.017.
10
Liver surgery for colorectal metastases: results after 10 years of follow-up. Long-term survivors, late recurrences, and prognostic role of morbidity.结直肠癌肝转移的肝脏手术:10年随访结果。长期生存者、晚期复发及并发症的预后作用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2458-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9935-9. Epub 2008 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
VEGF-C propagates 'onward' colorectal cancer metastasis from liver to lung.血管内皮生长因子-C促进结直肠癌从肝脏向肺的“远端”转移。
Br J Cancer. 2025 Jan;132(1):69-80. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02892-4. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
2
Microanatomical organization of hepatic venous lymphatic system in humans.肝静脉淋巴系统的微观解剖结构在人类中。
PLoS One. 2023 May 25;18(5):e0286316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286316. eCollection 2023.
3
Prognostic Role of the Intrahepatic Lymphatic System in Liver Cancer.肝内淋巴系统在肝癌中的预后作用
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 4;15(7):2142. doi: 10.3390/cancers15072142.
4
Histopathological prognostic factors for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.结直肠肝转移的组织病理学预后因素:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Histol Histopathol. 2021 Feb;36(2):159-181. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-274. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
5
Simultaneous curative resection of double colorectal carcinoma with synchronous bilobar liver metastases.同时性双原发性结直肠癌伴同步双叶肝转移的根治性切除。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Oct 15;10(10):293-316. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i10.293.
6
Laparoscopic Parenchyma-sparing Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases.腹腔镜保留实质肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移
Radiol Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;52(1):36-41. doi: 10.1515/raon-2017-0046. eCollection 2018 Mar.
7
Randomized Phase III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant CAPOX with or without Bevacizumab in Patients after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: HEPATICA study.评估辅助性CAPOX联合或不联合贝伐单抗对结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术后疗效和安全性的随机III期研究:HEPATICA研究
Neoplasia. 2017 Feb;19(2):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2016.08.010. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
8
The Role of Lymphatic Endothelial Cells in Liver Injury and Tumor Development.淋巴管内皮细胞在肝损伤和肿瘤发展中的作用。
Front Immunol. 2016 Nov 29;7:548. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00548. eCollection 2016.
9
Parenchymal-sparing liver surgery in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.结直肠癌肝转移患者的保留肝实质手术
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jun 27;8(6):407-23. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i6.407.
10
Safety analysis of the oncological outcome after vein-preserving surgery for colorectal liver metastases detached from the main hepatic veins.离断主要肝静脉的结直肠癌肝转移瘤保静脉手术肿瘤学结局的安全性分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Aug;400(6):683-91. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1332-9. Epub 2015 Aug 12.