Rigby S A, Thornton E W, Young C A
School of Psychology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;13(Pt 4):619-31. doi: 10.1348/135910707X241505. Epub 2007 Sep 8.
To document mood, self-efficacy, and resiliency in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) following a brief group psychological intervention, and to examine whether benefits were greater than those derived from provision of education or group social interaction.
A randomized controlled intervention trial assessing outcomes at five time points over a 1-year follow-up.
Participants with MS were assigned to one of three groups: one receiving brief group psychological intervention (PG) comprising three 90 minute cognitive behavioural sessions supported by an Information Booklet dealing with mental and emotional issues relating to MS; a group provided only with educational material - the information booklet group (IBG); and a group who not only received the booklet but also participated in non-structured social discussion (SDG) sessions similar in length and number to PG participants. Outcomes were documented using questionnaires.
Outcomes were assessed using area under the curve (AUC) analysis: a summary measure that considers individual changes serially over time to provide a more meaningful picture than the one based on single time points. Ninety participants were followed up over the 12-month post-intervention, and their data are included in the analysis. Analyses indicated benefits in all outcome dimensions for the psychotherapeutic (PG) and social discussion groups (SDG) relative to the IBG group, but no differences between PG and SDG.
The study indicates benefits from psychosocial intervention compared with bibliotherapy, with some additional benefit from psychological intervention compared with a social discussion group. Results suggest that much of the benefit may derive from non-specific therapeutic components. Without psychosocial intervention, the psychological status of people with MS worsened over time.
记录在接受简短的团体心理干预后,多发性硬化症(MS)患者的情绪、自我效能感和心理韧性,并研究这些益处是否大于通过提供教育或团体社交互动所获得的益处。
一项随机对照干预试验,在1年的随访期内的五个时间点评估结果。
MS患者被分配到三组中的一组:一组接受简短的团体心理干预(PG),包括三次90分钟的认知行为治疗课程,并配有一本关于MS相关心理和情绪问题的信息手册;一组只提供教育材料——信息手册组(IBG);还有一组不仅收到了手册,还参加了与PG组参与者时长和次数相似的非结构化社交讨论(SDG)课程。使用问卷记录结果。
使用曲线下面积(AUC)分析评估结果:这是一种汇总测量方法,它连续考虑个体随时间的变化,以提供比基于单个时间点的结果更有意义的情况。在干预后的12个月内对90名参与者进行了随访,他们的数据纳入了分析。分析表明,与IBG组相比,心理治疗组(PG)和社交讨论组(SDG)在所有结果维度上均有益处,但PG组和SDG组之间没有差异。
该研究表明,与阅读疗法相比,心理社会干预有益处,与社交讨论组相比,心理干预还有一些额外益处。结果表明,许多益处可能来自非特定的治疗成分。如果没有心理社会干预,MS患者的心理状态会随着时间推移而恶化。