Saely C H, Rein P, Drexel H
Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment (VIVIT), Feldkirch, Austria.
Horm Metab Res. 2007 Sep;39(9):642-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-985822.
Since the publication of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) consensus definition of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in 2005, numerous studies have compared the new IDF MetS category with previous MetS definitions in its association with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, and in its ability to predict vascular events and incident diabetes. The present review shows that the amount of cardiovascular risk conferred by the respective MetS definitions varies between populations; in most populations it is lower with the IDF MetS than with alternative MetS definitions. For incident diabetes, the number of existing studies appears too limited to draw definite conclusions. Like earlier definitions of the MetS, the IDF MetS is based on distinctive cutoff points for MetS stigmata, neglecting the fact that the risk factors are continuous and not categorical variables.
自国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)于2005年发布代谢综合征(MetS)的共识定义以来,众多研究比较了新的IDF MetS类别与先前的MetS定义在与心血管疾病患病率的关联以及预测血管事件和新发糖尿病能力方面的差异。本综述表明,各MetS定义所赋予的心血管风险量在不同人群中有所不同;在大多数人群中,IDF MetS所带来的心血管风险低于其他MetS定义。对于新发糖尿病,现有研究数量似乎过于有限,无法得出明确结论。与早期的MetS定义一样,IDF MetS基于MetS特征的独特切点,而忽略了风险因素是连续变量而非分类变量这一事实。