Suppr超能文献

一项关于视听患者信息干预对癌症临床试验知情同意和招募影响的随机对照研究。

A randomised controlled study of an audiovisual patient information intervention on informed consent and recruitment to cancer clinical trials.

作者信息

Hutchison C, Cowan C, McMahon T, Paul J

机构信息

Cancer Consultant Nurse, Acute Division, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Level 3, Office Suite 3B (Room 302), Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2007 Sep 17;97(6):705-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603943.

Abstract

Recruitment to cancer clinical trials needs to be improved, as does patient knowledge and understanding about clinical trials, in order for patients to make an informed choice about whether or not to take part. Audiovisual patient information (AVPI) has been shown to improve knowledge and understanding in various areas of practice, but there is limited information about its effect in the cancer clinical trial setting, particularly in relation to consent rates. In this study, 173 patients were randomised to receive either the AVPI, in addition to the standard trial-specific written information, or the written information alone. There was no difference in clinical trial recruitment rates between the two groups with similar study entry rates: 72.1% in the AVPI group and 75.9% in the standard information group. The estimated odds ratio for refusal (intervention/no intervention) was 1.19 (95% CI 0.55-2.58, P=0.661). Knowledge scores increased more in the AVPI group compared to the standard group (P=0.0072). The change in anxiety score between the arms was also statistically significant (P=0.011) with anxiety improving in the intervention arm more than in the no intervention arm. Audiovisual patient information was shown to be a useful tool in improving patient knowledge and anxiety, but further work is necessary in relation to its effect on clinical trial recruitment rates.

摘要

癌症临床试验的招募工作需要改进,患者对临床试验的了解和认识也需要提高,以便患者能够就是否参与做出明智的选择。视听患者信息(AVPI)已被证明能提高各个实践领域的知识和理解,但关于其在癌症临床试验环境中的效果,特别是与同意率相关的信息有限。在本研究中,173名患者被随机分为两组,一组除了接受标准的特定试验书面信息外,还接受AVPI,另一组仅接受书面信息。两组的临床试验招募率没有差异,研究入组率相似:AVPI组为72.1%,标准信息组为75.9%。拒绝(干预组/非干预组)的估计比值比为1.19(95%可信区间0.55 - 2.58,P = 0.661)。与标准组相比,AVPI组的知识得分增加更多(P = 0.0072)。两组之间焦虑评分的变化也具有统计学意义(P = 0.011),干预组的焦虑改善程度大于非干预组。视听患者信息被证明是提高患者知识和缓解焦虑的有用工具,但关于其对临床试验招募率的影响还需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccdc/2360384/701088459b89/6603943f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验