Suppr超能文献

如何恰当地做到恰当:对贝克和麦卡洛的评论

How to appropriate appropriately: a comment on Baker and McCullough.

作者信息

Jonsen Albert R

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2007 Mar;17(1):43-54. doi: 10.1353/ken.2007.0004.

Abstract

The article by Baker and McCullough in this issue posits that bioethics has generally applied moral theories to practical problems. They propose that, rather than this "application," bioethicists should "appropriate" aspects of ethical theory. This article disagrees that bioethical writing is primary "application." It agrees that "appropriation" is the most suitable approach to bioethical analysis but claims that the description of appropriation provided by Baker and McCullough is inadequate. It must be supplemented by the rhetorical concept of "invention."

摘要

本期贝克和麦卡洛的文章认为,生物伦理学通常将道德理论应用于实际问题。他们提议,生物伦理学家不应进行这种“应用”,而应“挪用”伦理理论的各个方面。本文不同意生物伦理学著作主要是“应用”这一观点。本文认同“挪用”是生物伦理分析最合适的方法,但认为贝克和麦卡洛对挪用的描述并不充分。必须用“发明”这一修辞概念对其加以补充。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验