Ganss Carolina, Schlueter Nadine, Hardt Martin, von Hinckeldey Judith, Klimek Joachim
Department of Conservative, Preventive Dentistry, Dental Clinic, Giessen, Germany.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2007 Oct;115(5):390-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00466.x.
It is an established assumption that eroded dental hard tissues are particularly prone to toothbrush abrasion. Only a few studies have aimed to show this for dentine and, if so, disregarded the complex histological structure of this tissue. Therefore, the present study sought (i) to investigate the effects of toothbrushing on eroded dentine and (ii) to analyze how the organic matrix influences the outcome of established methods for quantifying dental hard tissue loss. The effects of brushing were investigated by optical (P-O) and mechanical (P-M) profilometry, by longitudinal microradiography (LMR), and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM images showed that a demineralized organic layer had developed, which was unaffected by brushing. For substance loss, there was no significant difference between eroded and eroded/abraded samples. Considerable differences occurred, however, when results from the different methods were compared. P-O yielded the lowest (7.0 +/- 3.4 microm) and LMR the highest (109.8 +/- 10.7 microm) substance loss values. When the organic material was removed enzymatically, all methods gave comparable results. The results of this study do not lend support to the notion that brushing increases substance loss of eroded dentine. Profilometry was not suitable for measuring mineral loss, unless the organic material was removed.
人们普遍认为,被侵蚀的牙齿硬组织特别容易受到牙刷磨损。只有少数研究旨在证明牙本质的这种情况,即便如此,这些研究也忽视了该组织复杂的组织结构。因此,本研究旨在:(i)研究刷牙对被侵蚀牙本质的影响;(ii)分析有机基质如何影响既定的牙齿硬组织丧失量化方法的结果。通过光学轮廓测量法(P-O)和机械轮廓测量法(P-M)、纵向显微放射照相术(LMR)以及扫描电子显微镜(SEM)来研究刷牙的影响。SEM图像显示,已形成了一层脱矿质的有机层,该层不受刷牙影响。对于物质丧失,被侵蚀样本和被侵蚀/磨损样本之间没有显著差异。然而,比较不同方法的结果时,出现了相当大的差异。P-O得出的物质丧失值最低(7.0±3.4微米),LMR得出的最高(109.8±10.7微米)。当通过酶法去除有机物质时,所有方法都给出了可比的结果。本研究结果并不支持刷牙会增加被侵蚀牙本质物质丧失这一观点。轮廓测量法不适合测量矿物质丧失,除非去除有机物质。