Coster Wendy, Khetani Mary Alunkal
Boston University, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(8):639-48. doi: 10.1080/09638280701400375.
The aim of this paper is to examine conceptual issues that challenge development of valid and useful measures of children's participation.
Ambiguities in the current definition of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) are examined along with their implications for developing valid measures for children and youth.
Developers of new measures must address three key issues that will affect the ultimate meaning of participation data obtained from these instruments: uncertain criteria to distinguish activity from participation; lack of consensus on whether measures should address objective or subjective aspects of participation or both; and appropriate choice of respondent when children are the focus. Variations in how the participation construct is operationalized challenge one's ability to develop a coherent body of knowledge about children's participation and the factors that influence it.
Given current variations in how participation is being defined, both developers and users of measures of participation need to be explicit about the definition of participation that a particular measure represents and the inferences that can be drawn from the scores.
本文旨在探讨一些概念性问题,这些问题对制定有效且实用的儿童参与度测量方法构成挑战。
研究《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)中当前参与度定义的模糊之处,以及这些模糊之处对为儿童和青少年制定有效测量方法的影响。
新测量方法的开发者必须解决三个关键问题,这些问题将影响从这些工具中获得的参与度数据的最终意义:区分活动与参与的标准不明确;对于测量方法应关注参与的客观方面还是主观方面或两者兼顾,缺乏共识;当以儿童为重点时,应答者的恰当选择。参与度结构的操作方式存在差异,这对形成关于儿童参与度及其影响因素的连贯知识体系的能力构成挑战。
鉴于目前参与度定义的差异,参与度测量方法的开发者和使用者都需要明确特定测量方法所代表的参与度定义以及从分数中可以得出的推论。