Bass David, Richards Thomas A, Matthai Lena, Marsh Victoria, Cavalier-Smith Thomas
Department of Zoology, The University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Sep 13;7:162. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-162.
It is much debated whether microbes are easily dispersed globally or whether they, like many macro-organisms, have historical biogeographies. The ubiquitous dispersal hypothesis states that microbes are so numerous and so easily dispersed worldwide that all should be globally distributed and found wherever growing conditions suit them. This has been broadly upheld for protists (microbial eukaryotes) by most morphological and some molecular analyses. However, morphology and most previously used evolutionary markers evolve too slowly to test this important hypothesis adequately.
Here we use a fast-evolving marker (ITS1 rDNA) to map global diversity and distribution of three different clades of cercomonad Protozoa (Eocercomonas and Paracercomonas: phylum Cercozoa) by sequencing multiple environmental gene libraries constructed from 47-80 globally-dispersed samples per group. Even with this enhanced resolution, identical ITS sequences (ITS-types) were retrieved from widely separated sites and on all continents for several genotypes, implying relatively rapid global dispersal. Some identical ITS-types were even recovered from both marine and non-marine samples, habitats that generally harbour significantly different protist communities. Conversely, other ITS-types had either patchy or restricted distributions.
Our results strongly suggest that geographic dispersal in macro-organisms and microbes is not fundamentally different: some taxa show restricted and/or patchy distributions while others are clearly cosmopolitan. These results are concordant with the 'moderate endemicity model' of microbial biogeography. Rare or continentally endemic microbes may be ecologically significant and potentially of conservational concern. We also demonstrate that strains with identical 18S but different ITS1 rDNA sequences can differ significantly in terms of morphological and important physiological characteristics, providing strong additional support for global protist biodiversity being significantly higher than previously thought.
微生物是易于在全球范围内扩散,还是像许多大型生物一样具有历史生物地理学特征,这一问题备受争议。普遍扩散假说认为,微生物数量众多且易于在全球范围内扩散,以至于所有微生物都应在全球分布,只要生长条件适宜就能找到它们。大多数形态学分析和一些分子分析在很大程度上支持了原生生物(微生物真核生物)的这一假说。然而,形态学和大多数先前使用的进化标记进化速度过慢,无法充分检验这一重要假说。
在这里,我们使用快速进化的标记(ITS1 rDNA),通过对每组47 - 80个全球分散样本构建的多个环境基因文库进行测序,来绘制三种不同进化枝的圆纤毛虫原生动物(始圆纤虫属和副圆纤虫属:丝足虫门)的全球多样性和分布情况。即便有了这种更高的分辨率,仍从相距遥远的地点以及各大洲的样本中检索到了几种基因型的相同ITS序列(ITS类型),这意味着全球扩散相对较快。甚至在海洋和非海洋样本(通常含有截然不同的原生生物群落的栖息地)中都发现了一些相同的ITS类型。相反,其他ITS类型的分布则是零散的或受限的。
我们的结果有力地表明,大型生物和微生物的地理扩散在本质上并非不同:一些分类群呈现出受限和/或零散的分布,而另一些则明显是世界性的。这些结果与微生物生物地理学的“中度特有性模型”一致。稀有或大陆性特有的微生物可能具有生态意义,并且可能在保护方面受到关注。我们还证明,具有相同18S但不同ITS1 rDNA序列的菌株在形态和重要生理特征方面可能存在显著差异,这为全球原生生物生物多样性显著高于先前认为的水平提供了有力的额外支持。