Pesch Beate, Kappler Martin, Straif Kurt, Marczynski Boleslaw, Preuss Ralf, Rossbach Bernd, Rihs Hans-Peter, Weiss Tobias, Rabstein Sylvia, Pierl Christiane, Scherenberg Michael, Adams Ansgar, Käfferlein Heiko Udo, Angerer Jürgen, Wilhelm Michael, Seidel Albrecht, Brüning Thomas
BGFA Forschungsinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin der Deatschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Sep;16(9):1863-73. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0033.
In regulatory toxicology, the dose-response relationship between occupational exposure and biomarkers is of importance in setting threshold values. We analyzed the relationships between occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and various biomarkers of internal exposure and DNA damage with data from 284 highly exposed male workers. Personal exposure to phenanthrene and other PAHs was measured during shift and correlated with the sum of 1-, 2+9-, 3-, and 4-hydroxyphenanthrenes in post-shift urine. PAHs and hydroxyphenanthrenes were associated with DNA damage assessed in WBC as 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine/10(6) dGuo and strand breaks by Comet assay as Olive tail moment. Hydroxyphenanthrenes correlated with phenanthrene (Spearman r(s) = 0.70; P < 0.0001). No correlations could be found between strand breaks and exposure (r(s) = 0.01, P < 0.0001 for PAHs; r(s) = -0.03, P = 0.68 for hydroxyphenanthrenes). Correlations with 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine/10(6) dGuo were weakly negative (r(s) = -0.22, P = 0.004 for PAHs) or flat (r(s) = -0.08, P = 0.31 for hydroxyphenanthrenes). Linear splines were applied to assess the relationships between the log-transformed variables. All regression models were adjusted for smoking and type of industry. For hydroxyphenanthrenes, 51.7% of the variance could be explained by phenanthrene and other predictors. Up to 0.77 microg/m(3) phenanthrene, no association could be found with hydroxyphenanthrenes. Above that point, hydroxyphenanthrenes increased by a factor of 1.47 under a doubling of phenanthrene exposure (slope, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.64). Hydroxyphenanthrenes may be recommended as biomarker of occupational PAH exposure, whereas biomarkers of DNA damage in blood did not show a dose-response relation to PAH exposure.
在监管毒理学中,职业暴露与生物标志物之间的剂量反应关系对于设定阈值至关重要。我们利用284名高暴露男性工人的数据,分析了职业性多环芳烃(PAH)暴露与各种内暴露生物标志物及DNA损伤之间的关系。在轮班期间测量了个人对菲及其他PAH的暴露情况,并将其与轮班后尿液中1-、2+9-、3-和4-羟基菲的总和进行关联。PAH和羟基菲与白细胞中通过彗星试验评估的DNA损伤相关,DNA损伤以8-氧代-7,8-二氢-2'-脱氧鸟苷/10(6)dGuo表示,链断裂以橄榄尾矩表示。羟基菲与菲相关(斯皮尔曼r(s)=0.70;P<0.0001)。未发现链断裂与暴露之间存在相关性(PAH的r(s)=0.01,P<0.0001;羟基菲的r(s)=-0.03,P=0.68)。与8-氧代-7,8-二氢-2'-脱氧鸟苷/10(6)dGuo的相关性呈弱负相关(PAH的r(s)=-0.22,P=0.004)或无明显相关性(羟基菲的r(s)=-0.08,P=0.31)。应用线性样条评估对数转换变量之间的关系。所有回归模型均针对吸烟和行业类型进行了调整。对于羟基菲,51.7%的方差可由菲及其他预测因子解释。在菲浓度高达0.77μg/m(3)时,未发现与羟基菲存在关联。超过该点后,菲暴露量翻倍时,羟基菲增加了1.47倍(斜率为0.56;95%置信区间为0.47-0.64)。羟基菲可被推荐作为职业性PAH暴露的生物标志物,而血液中的DNA损伤生物标志物未显示出与PAH暴露的剂量反应关系。