Ahrens W, Jöckel K H, Patzak W, Elsner G
Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine, Federal Republic of Germany.
Am J Ind Med. 1991;20(4):477-93. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700200404.
A hospital-based case-control study of laryngeal cancer was conducted in Bremen in 1986 and 1987 with 100 prevalent male laryngeal cancer patients and 100 male hospital controls with diseases not considered to be related to smoking, alcohol, or occupational exposures, who were frequency matched by age. The odds ratio for heavy smoking (more than 30 pack-years) reached a value of 3.5 (95% confidence limits (CL) 1.1, 7.9). Ex-smokers showed a significant decrease in risk; this reached the level of those who had never smoked about 15 years after smoking cessation. For daily consumers of alcohol an odds ratio of 3.2 (95% CL 1.4, 7.5) was observed. Among the 17 occupations in which at least ten subjects had worked, excess risks were observed for stock keeping and transportation workers, and for leather and textile workers. The odds ratio was significantly increased for the latter (p less than 0.05). Among all those persons ever employed in a priori defined-risk occupations, an odds ratio of 2.74 (95% CL 1.23, 6.06) was observed. Considering responses to an exposure check-list, no increased risks could be shown for exposure to asbestos, coal tar, or welding fumes. On the other hand, excess risks were observed for exposures to diesel oil, gasoline, and mineral oil, controlling for smoking and alcohol. The findings in occupational and exposure subgroups were based on small numbers of cases and controls and, consequently, were subject to large sampling errors. Many of the results are consistent, however, with occupational risk factors reported from other studies.
1986年和1987年在不来梅开展了一项基于医院的喉癌病例对照研究,研究对象为100名男性喉癌现患患者以及100名男性医院对照,这些对照患有被认为与吸烟、饮酒或职业暴露无关的疾病,他们按年龄进行频数匹配。重度吸烟(超过30包年)的优势比达到3.5(95%置信区间(CL)为1.1至7.9)。已戒烟者的风险显著降低;戒烟后约15年,其风险降至从不吸烟者的水平。对于每日饮酒者,观察到优势比为3.2(95% CL为1.4至7.5)。在至少有10名受试者从事过工作的17种职业中,库存管理和运输工人以及皮革和纺织工人出现了超额风险。后者的优势比显著升高(p<0.05)。在所有曾从事先定义的高风险职业的人群中,观察到优势比为2.74(95% CL为1.23至6.06)。考虑到对暴露检查表的回答,未发现接触石棉、煤焦油或焊接烟尘会增加风险。另一方面,在控制吸烟和饮酒因素后,观察到接触柴油、汽油和矿物油会出现超额风险。职业和暴露亚组的研究结果基于少量病例和对照,因此存在较大抽样误差。然而,许多结果与其他研究报告的职业风险因素一致。