Fitzgerald Paul B, Sritharan Anusha, Daskalakis Zafiris J, de Castella Anthony R, Kulkarni Jayashri, Egan Gary
Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University Department of Psychological Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Oct;27(5):488-92. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e318151521c.
The study aimed to explore the biological effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LFR-TMS) treatment applied to the right prefrontal cortex, comparing this with the effects of high-frequency left-sided (HFL-TMS) in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Twenty-six patients with treatment-resistant depression were randomized to receive either daily LFR-TMS or HFL-TMS treatment for 3 weeks and underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a planning task before and after treatment. Patients responded clinically to both forms of treatment with no difference in the degree of response (F1,24 = 0.65;P > 0.05). Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation resulted in no overall change in task-related activation. However, responders to LFR-TMS demonstrated a bilateral decrease in activity in middle frontal gyrus. In contrast, HFL-TMS produced an increase in activation in left precuneus with responders showing increased activation in several additional regions. Response to LFR-TMS is associated with a bilateral reduction in frontal activation that does not seem to be a nonspecific effect of treatment and differs from the response to HFL-TMS.
该研究旨在探讨应用于右前额叶皮质的低频重复经颅磁刺激(LFR-TMS)治疗的生物学效应,并将其与高频左侧经颅磁刺激(HFL-TMS)对难治性抑郁症患者的疗效进行比较。26例难治性抑郁症患者被随机分为两组,分别接受为期3周的每日LFR-TMS或HFL-TMS治疗,并在治疗前后的一项规划任务中接受功能磁共振成像检查。患者对两种治疗方式均有临床反应,反应程度无差异(F1,24 = 0.65;P > 0.05)。低频重复经颅磁刺激未导致与任务相关的激活出现总体变化。然而,LFR-TMS的反应者在额中回的活动出现双侧降低。相比之下,HFL-TMS使左侧楔前叶的激活增加,反应者在其他几个区域的激活也增加。对LFR-TMS的反应与额叶激活的双侧减少有关,这似乎不是治疗的非特异性效应,且与对HFL-TMS的反应不同。