• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多重性带来的棘手且普遍存在的问题。

The difficult and ubiquitous problems of multiplicities.

作者信息

Berry Donald A

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Pharm Stat. 2007 Jul-Sep;6(3):155-60. doi: 10.1002/pst.303.

DOI:10.1002/pst.303
PMID:17879328
Abstract

Multiplicities are ubiquitous. They threaten every inference in every aspect of life. Despite the focus in statistics on multiplicities, statisticians underestimate their importance. One reason is that the focus is on methodology for known multiplicities. Silent multiplicities are much more important and they are insidious. Both frequentists and Bayesians have important contributions to make regarding problems of multiplicities. But neither group has an inside track. Frequentists and Bayesians working together is a promising way of making inroads into this knotty set of problems. Two experiments with identical results may well lead to very different statistical conclusions. So we will never be able to use a software package with default settings to resolve all problems of multiplicities. Every problem has unique aspects. And all problems require understanding the substantive area of application.

摘要

多重性无处不在。它们威胁着生活方方面面的每一项推断。尽管统计学中对多重性颇为关注,但统计学家低估了其重要性。一个原因是关注的是针对已知多重性的方法。隐性多重性更为重要且具有隐蔽性。在多重性问题上,频率论者和贝叶斯论者都能做出重要贡献。但这两个群体都没有捷径可走。频率论者和贝叶斯论者携手合作是攻克这一棘手问题集的一种很有前景的方式。两个结果相同的实验很可能会得出截然不同的统计结论。所以我们永远无法使用默认设置的软件包来解决所有多重性问题。每个问题都有其独特之处。而且所有问题都需要理解应用的实质领域。

相似文献

1
The difficult and ubiquitous problems of multiplicities.多重性带来的棘手且普遍存在的问题。
Pharm Stat. 2007 Jul-Sep;6(3):155-60. doi: 10.1002/pst.303.
2
Structured incorporation of prior information in relationship identification problems.在关系识别问题中对先验信息进行结构化整合。
Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Jul;71(Pt 4):501-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00345.x. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
3
Bayesians in clinical trials: asleep at the switch.临床试验中的贝叶斯派:错失良机。
Stat Med. 2008 Feb 20;27(4):469-82; discussion 483-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.2928.
4
[Roaming through methodology. XXXVI. Likelihood ratios and Bayes' rule].[方法漫谈。三十六。似然比与贝叶斯法则]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Dec 15;145(50):2421-4.
5
A hybrid model for reducing ecological bias.一种用于减少生态偏差的混合模型。
Biostatistics. 2008 Jan;9(1):1-17. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm022. Epub 2007 Jun 16.
6
Moving in Parallel Toward a Modern Modeling Epistemology: Bayes Factors and Frequentist Modeling Methods.并行迈向现代建模认识论:贝叶斯因子与频率主义建模方法
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016;51(1):30-4. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1093459.
7
Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.形式统计学显著性对观察性关联可信度的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 15;168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn156. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
8
Multiple comparisons distortions of parameter estimates.参数估计的多重比较偏差。
Biostatistics. 2007 Apr;8(2):500-4. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl025. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
9
Accounting for multiplicities in assessing drug safety: a three-level hierarchical mixture model.评估药物安全性时考虑多重性:一种三级分层混合模型。
Biometrics. 2004 Jun;60(2):418-26. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00186.x.
10
Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.受试者工作特征曲线的贝叶斯自助法估计
Stat Med. 2008 Nov 20;27(26):5407-20. doi: 10.1002/sim.3366.

引用本文的文献

1
Listening to the Data: Computational Approaches to Addiction and Learning.倾听数据:成瘾与学习的计算方法。
J Neurosci. 2023 Nov 8;43(45):7547-7553. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1415-23.2023.
2
Curcumin May (Not) Defy Science.姜黄素或许(并非)违背科学。
ACS Med Chem Lett. 2017 May 11;8(5):467-470. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00139.
3
Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associations.对模型设定所导致的效应振动进行评估,可以证明观察性关联的不稳定性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):1046-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.029. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
4
Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics.数据分析和统计学常见误区。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015 Feb;3(1):e00093. doi: 10.1002/prp2.93. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
5
Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics.关于数据分析和统计学的常见误解。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;387(11):1017-23. doi: 10.1007/s00210-014-1037-6. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
6
Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics.关于数据分析和统计学的常见误解。
Br J Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;172(8):2126-32. doi: 10.1111/bph.12884. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
7
Multiplicities in cancer research: ubiquitous and necessary evils.癌症研究中的多样性:普遍存在且必要的弊端。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Aug 8;104(15):1124-32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs301. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
8
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer: overview of 15 randomized trials.高剂量化疗联合自体造血干细胞支持作为乳腺癌辅助治疗:15 项随机试验概述。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 20;29(24):3214-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.5910. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
9
Bayesian versus frequentist statistical inference for investigating a one-off cancer cluster reported to a health department.贝叶斯方法与频率论统计推断在调查上报给卫生部门的一次性癌症聚集性病例中的应用
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 May 11;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-30.