Gandini Sara, Botteri Edoardo, Iodice Simona, Boniol Mathieu, Lowenfels Albert B, Maisonneuve Patrick, Boyle Peter
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Int J Cancer. 2008 Jan 1;122(1):155-64. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23033.
We conducted a systematic meta-analysis of observational studies on cigarette smoking and cancer from 1961 to 2003. The aim was to quantify the risk for 13 cancer sites, recognized to be related to tobacco smoking by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and to analyze the risk variation for each site in a systematic manner. We extracted data from 254 reports published between 1961 and 2003 (177 case-control studies, 75 cohorts and 2 nested case-control studies) included in the 2004 IARC Monograph on Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. The analyses were carried out on 216 studies with reported estimates for 'current' and/or 'former' smokers. We performed sensitivity analysis, and looked for publication and other types of bias. Lung (RR = 8.96; 95% CI: 6.73-12.11), laryngeal (RR = 6.98; 95% CI: 3.14-15.52) and pharyngeal (RR = 6.76; 95% CI: 2.86-15.98) cancers presented the highest relative risks (RRs) for current smokers, followed by upper digestive tract (RR = 3.57; 95% CI: 2.63-4.84) and oral (RR = 3.43; 95% CI: 2.37-4.94) cancers. As expected, pooled RRs for respiratory cancers were greater than the pooled estimates for other sites. The analysis of heterogeneity showed that study type, gender and adjustment for confounding factors significantly influence the RRs estimates and the reliability of the studies.
我们对1961年至2003年期间关于吸烟与癌症的观察性研究进行了系统的荟萃分析。目的是量化国际癌症研究机构(IARC)认定的与吸烟相关的13个癌症部位的风险,并系统地分析每个部位的风险变化。我们从2004年IARC关于烟草烟雾和非自愿吸烟的专论中收录的1961年至2003年发表的254份报告(177项病例对照研究、75项队列研究和2项巢式病例对照研究)中提取了数据。对216项报告了“当前”和/或“既往”吸烟者估计值的研究进行了分析。我们进行了敏感性分析,并查找了发表偏倚和其他类型的偏倚。肺癌(RR = 8.96;95%CI:6.73 - 12.11)、喉癌(RR = 6.98;95%CI:3.14 - 15.52)和咽癌(RR = 6.76;95%CI:2.86 - 15.98)在当前吸烟者中呈现出最高的相对风险(RRs),其次是上消化道癌(RR = 3.57;95%CI:2.63 - 4.84)和口腔癌(RR = 3.43;95%CI:2.37 - 4.94)。正如预期的那样,呼吸道癌症的合并RRs大于其他部位的合并估计值。异质性分析表明,研究类型、性别以及对混杂因素的调整显著影响RRs估计值和研究的可靠性。