Kim Jung Hyun, Kim Haedong, Kim Man S, Chun Mison, Shin Jaeyong
Division of Tourism and Wellness, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (HUFS), Yongin, Republic of Korea.
School of Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
BMC Med. 2025 May 30;23(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04121-y.
Cancer remains a leading global cause of mortality, responsible for nearly 10 million deaths in 2020. Given the country's low birth rate and aging population, the escalating cancer burden poses significant challenges to its healthcare systems. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between lifestyle risk factors and cancer case fatality, emphasizing the collective impact of these factors through a prevention index at the regional level.
The study focused on ten cancer types, categorizing counties into three levels of cancer incidence rates using group-based trajectory modeling to identify disparities in patterns and levels among groups. Additionally, we segmented the proportions of obesity prevalence, average daily per capita smoking amount, prevalence of smoking, prevalence of high-risk alcohol consumption, prevalence of hypertension diagnosis, prevalence of diabetes diagnosis, and cancer case fatality into three groups through group-based trajectory modeling. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to evaluate the hazard ratios (HR) for cancer case fatality, adjusting for age, sex, income level, and cancer stage.
The study population comprised 294,070 cancer patients, with thyroid, stomach, colorectal, breast, and lung cancers being the most common. The prevention index (PI) levels, calculated from six primary prevention indicators, were categorized into High, Medium, and Low grades. Counties with higher PI levels (H) exhibited significantly lower cancer case fatality among cancer patients compared to those with lower PI levels (L). Across all cancer types, females had lower cancer case fatality compared to males, higher age was linked to higher cancer case fatality, advanced stage cases had the highest cancer case fatality, and the highest income quintile consistently showed the lowest cancer case fatality.
The study highlights the significant inverse relationship between primary prevention indicator levels and cancer case fatality. Higher scores on primary prevention indicators are associated with lower cancer mortality among cancer patients for various cancer types, underscoring the importance of comprehensive, community-based prevention strategies in mitigating cancer risk and improving public health outcomes in South Korea.
癌症仍然是全球主要的死亡原因,2020年造成了近1000万人死亡。鉴于该国的低出生率和人口老龄化,不断增加的癌症负担给其医疗系统带来了重大挑战。本研究旨在调查生活方式风险因素与癌症病例死亡率之间的关系,通过区域层面的预防指数强调这些因素的综合影响。
该研究聚焦于十种癌症类型,使用基于群组的轨迹模型将各县分为癌症发病率的三个水平,以识别不同群体在模式和水平上的差异。此外,我们通过基于群组的轨迹模型将肥胖患病率、人均每日吸烟量、吸烟率、高危饮酒患病率、高血压诊断患病率、糖尿病诊断患病率和癌症病例死亡率的比例分为三组。采用Cox比例风险模型评估癌症病例死亡率的风险比(HR),并对年龄、性别、收入水平和癌症分期进行调整。
研究人群包括294,070名癌症患者,甲状腺癌、胃癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和肺癌最为常见。根据六个主要预防指标计算的预防指数(PI)水平分为高、中、低三个等级。与PI水平较低(L)的县相比,PI水平较高(H)的县的癌症患者癌症病例死亡率显著较低。在所有癌症类型中,女性的癌症病例死亡率低于男性,年龄越大癌症病例死亡率越高,晚期病例的癌症病例死亡率最高,收入最高的五分之一人群始终显示出最低的癌症病例死亡率。
该研究强调了主要预防指标水平与癌症病例死亡率之间的显著负相关关系。主要预防指标得分较高与各类癌症患者较低的癌症死亡率相关,这凸显了全面的、基于社区的预防策略在降低韩国癌症风险和改善公共卫生结果方面的重要性。