• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆固醇筛查会导致负面标签效应吗?马萨诸塞州血液胆固醇筛查项目模型系统的结果。

Does cholesterol screening result in negative labeling effects? Results of the Massachusetts Model Systems for Blood Cholesterol Screening Project.

作者信息

Havas S, Reisman J, Hsu L, Koumjian L

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1991 Jan;151(1):113-9.

PMID:1789817
Abstract

Several previous studies that looked at the effects of labeling individuals as hypertensive found increases in psychosocial distress, diminished feelings of well-being, or absenteeism. Other studies found no such effects. Thus far, similar studies relating to labeling for high blood cholesterol levels have not been published. The Massachusetts Model Systems for Blood Cholesterol Screening Project investigated whether labeling effects occurred as a result of the community-based screening, education, and referral programs it conducted in Worcester and Lowell. Nine questions concerning perceptions of physical and psychological well-being were asked on a questionnaire given to screening participants. The same questions were asked as part of a follow-up questionnaire given to all individuals identified as having high blood cholesterol levels at one of the screenings. Comparison of the baseline and follow-up results did not demonstrate significant overall negative effects among any age, sex, racial, income, or educational groups. On the contrary, responses to many of the questions revealed small but statistically significant improvements in perceptions of physical and psychological well-being. The absence of negative labeling effects may be attributable to the positive, supportive approach to participant counseling taken by the project.

摘要

此前有几项研究关注给个体贴上高血压标签的影响,结果发现心理社会困扰增加、幸福感降低或旷工现象。其他研究则未发现此类影响。到目前为止,尚未发表与给高胆固醇水平贴标签相关的类似研究。马萨诸塞州血液胆固醇筛查项目模型系统调查了在伍斯特和洛厄尔开展的社区筛查、教育及转诊项目是否会产生标签效应。在发给筛查参与者的问卷中,询问了九个关于身心健康认知的问题。在发给所有在其中一次筛查中被确定为高胆固醇水平个体的后续问卷中,也问到了同样的问题。对基线和后续结果的比较并未显示在任何年龄、性别、种族、收入或教育群体中存在显著的总体负面影响。相反,对许多问题的回答显示,在身心健康认知方面有虽小但在统计学上显著的改善。未出现负面标签效应可能归因于该项目对参与者咨询采取的积极、支持性方法。

相似文献

1
Does cholesterol screening result in negative labeling effects? Results of the Massachusetts Model Systems for Blood Cholesterol Screening Project.胆固醇筛查会导致负面标签效应吗?马萨诸塞州血液胆固醇筛查项目模型系统的结果。
Arch Intern Med. 1991 Jan;151(1):113-9.
2
Labeling of participants in high blood pressure screening programs. Implications for blood cholesterol screenings.
Arch Intern Med. 1988 Sep;148(9):1993-7.
3
A supermarket cardiovascular screening program: analysis of participants' solicitation of follow-up care.一项超市心血管筛查项目:参与者后续护理需求分析
Am J Prev Med. 1994 Sep-Oct;10(5):283-9.
4
The North Coast Cholesterol Check Campaign. Results of the first three years of a large-scale public screening programme.北海岸胆固醇检查活动。一项大规模公众筛查项目头三年的结果。
Med J Aust. 1991 Mar 18;154(6):385-91.
5
The Brookline Early Education Project: a 25-year follow-up study of a family-centered early health and development intervention.布鲁克莱恩早期教育项目:一项以家庭为中心的早期健康与发展干预措施的25年随访研究。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):144-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2515.
6
Reflotron performance in a community screening program: results of the Massachusetts Model Systems for Blood Cholesterol Screening Project.Reflotron在社区筛查项目中的表现:马萨诸塞州血液胆固醇筛查项目模型系统的结果
Am J Prev Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;7(6):397-405.
7
Effects of labeling and treatment of hypertension on perceived health.高血压的标识与治疗对健康认知的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 1986 Sep-Oct;2(5):256-61.
8
Impact of a public cholesterol screening program.一项公共胆固醇筛查项目的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 1990 Dec;150(12):2567-72.
9
The Norwegian cholesterol campaign: a one year follow-up evaluation of a local action.
Homeost Health Dis. 1991;33(5-6):239-45.
10
Indianapolis cholesterol screening 1987: does mass screening accomplish its goal?1987年印第安纳波利斯胆固醇筛查:大规模筛查是否实现了其目标?
Indiana Med. 1989 Jul;82(7):526-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.常规使用全球冠心病风险评分会转化为临床益处还是危害?一项文献系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 20;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-60.
2
Poorer self assessed health in a prospective study of men with screen detected abdominal aortic aneurysm: a predictor or a consequence of screening outcome?在一项针对经筛查发现腹主动脉瘤的男性的前瞻性研究中,自我评估健康状况较差:是筛查结果的预测因素还是后果?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Dec;58(12):1042-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.019307.
3
Health-related quality of life in cardiac patients with dyslipidemia and hypertension.
合并血脂异常和高血压的心脏病患者的健康相关生活质量
Qual Life Res. 2004 May;13(4):793-804. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000021695.26201.a0.
4
Cholesterol and coronary heart disease: screening and treatment.胆固醇与冠心病:筛查与治疗
Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7(4):232-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.4.232.
5
Economic evaluation of cholesterol-related interventions in general practice. An appraisal of the evidence.全科医疗中胆固醇相关干预措施的经济学评估。证据评估。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Sep;52(9):586-94. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.9.586.
6
Cholesterol screening and cholesterol lowering treatment.胆固醇筛查与降胆固醇治疗。
Qual Health Care. 1993 Jun;2(2):134-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.2.134.
7
Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 3. Physical, psychological and social harm.预防。有多大危害?有多大益处?3. 身体、心理和社会危害。
CMAJ. 1996 Jul 15;155(2):169-76.