Fujita Hiromasa, Tsubuku Tetsuji, Tanaka Toshiaki, Tanaka Yuichi, Matono Satoru, Shirouzu Kazuo
Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2007 Sep;108(5):246-52.
We report our findings on the clinical efficacy and impact of using the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Cancer after inquiry-based research involving the council members of the Japan Esophageal Society. The majority of the 145 respondents were esophageal surgeons with more than 20 years' experience at university hospitals or major clinical centers throughout Japan. They generally treated esophageal cancer following the guidelines. Although each surgeon makes his or her own judgment in each case, they reported that they experienced less stress when using the guidelines, or more stress when using non-standard treatment deviating from the guidelines. A key finding was that the guidelines were overly complex and difficult to understand concerning informed consent, especially by patients. Only one-half of the respondents followed the guidelines when obtaining informed consent, because they are too difficult and vague for patients to understand. The guidelines should therefore be revised and improved in this aspect.
在对日本食管癌学会理事会成员进行基于询问的研究后,我们报告了关于食管癌诊断和治疗指南的临床疗效及影响的研究结果。145名受访者中的大多数是在日本各地大学医院或主要临床中心拥有20多年经验的食管外科医生。他们一般遵循这些指南治疗食管癌。尽管每位外科医生在每个病例中都会做出自己的判断,但他们报告称,使用指南时压力较小,而使用偏离指南的非标准治疗时压力较大。一个关键发现是,这些指南在知情同意方面过于复杂且难以理解,尤其是对患者而言。在获取知情同意时,只有一半的受访者遵循指南,因为这些指南对患者来说太难理解且过于模糊。因此,在这方面应对指南进行修订和完善。