Stitzer Maxine L, Petry Nancy, Peirce Jessica, Kirby Kimberly, Killeen Therese, Roll John, Hamilton John, Stabile Patricia Q, Sterling Robert, Brown Chanda, Kolodner Ken, Li Rui
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Oct;75(5):805-11. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.805.
Intake urinalysis test result (drug positive vs. negative) has been previously identified as a strong predictor of drug abuse treatment outcome, but there is little information about how this prognostic factor may interact with the type of treatment delivered. The authors used data from a multisite study of abstinence incentives for stimulant abusers enrolled in outpatient counseling treatment (N. M. Petry, J. M. Peirce, et al., 2005) to examine this question. The first study urine was used to stratify participants into stimulant negative (n = 306) versus positive (n = 108) subgroups. Abstinence incentives significantly improved retention in those testing negative but not in those testing positive. Findings suggest that stimulant abusers presenting to treatment with a stimulant-negative urine benefit from abstinence incentives, but alternative treatment approaches are needed for those who test stimulant positive at intake.
入组时尿液分析检测结果(药物阳性与阴性)先前已被确定为药物滥用治疗结果的有力预测指标,但关于这一预后因素如何与所提供的治疗类型相互作用的信息却很少。作者利用一项针对参加门诊咨询治疗的兴奋剂滥用者的禁欲激励措施的多地点研究数据(N.M.佩特里、J.M.皮尔斯等人,2005年)来研究这个问题。首次研究尿液被用于将参与者分为兴奋剂阴性(n = 306)和阳性(n = 108)亚组。禁欲激励措施显著提高了检测为阴性者的留存率,但对检测为阳性者却没有效果。研究结果表明,入组时尿液兴奋剂检测为阴性的兴奋剂滥用者能从禁欲激励措施中获益,但对于入组时检测为兴奋剂阳性的人,则需要采用其他治疗方法。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007-10
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007-8
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006-7-27
Psychiatry Res. 2006-9-30
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010-6
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003-11
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2025-3
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023-8
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017-1
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015-10
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015-6