Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Mid Atlantic Node, NIDA CTN, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jun;38 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.12.010.
The purpose of this article is to review both main findings and secondary analyses from studies of abstinence incentives conducted in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN). Previous research has supported the efficacy of tangible incentives provided contingent on evidence of recent drug abstinence. CTN conducted the first multisite effectiveness trial of this novel intervention. Study participants were stimulant abusers (N = 803) participating in treatment at 14 clinical sites and randomly assigned to treatment as usual with or without a prize draw incentive program. Study participants could earn up to $400 over 3 months for submission of drug-free urine and breath (BAL) specimens. Three-month retention was significantly improved by incentives offered to psychosocial counseling clients (50% incentive vs. 35% control retained), whereas ongoing stimulant drug use was significantly reduced in methadone maintenance clients (54.4% incentive vs. 38.7% control samples testing stimulant-negative). In both settings, duration of continuous abstinence achieved was improved in the incentive condition. These studies support effectiveness of one abstinence incentive intervention and highlight the different outcomes that can be expected with application in methadone maintenance versus psychosocial counseling treatment settings. Secondary analyses have shown the importance of early treatment positive versus negative urine screens in moderating the outcome of abstinence incentives and have explored both safety and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Implications for the use of motivational incentive methods in clinical practice are discussed.
本文旨在回顾国家药物滥用治疗临床试验网络(CTN)进行的关于戒除奖励研究的主要发现和次要分析。先前的研究支持了根据近期戒毒证据提供有形奖励的有效性。CTN 首次对这种新干预措施进行了多地点有效性试验。研究参与者为兴奋剂滥用者(N=803),他们在 14 个临床地点接受治疗,并随机分配接受常规治疗或常规治疗加抽奖激励计划。研究参与者可以通过提交无毒品尿液和呼吸(BAL)样本,在 3 个月内最多获得 400 美元。激励措施显著提高了心理社会咨询客户的 3 个月保留率(50%的激励组与 35%的对照组保留),而美沙酮维持治疗客户的持续使用兴奋剂药物显著减少(54.4%的激励组与 38.7%的对照组样本检测呈阴性)。在这两种情况下,激励条件下实现的连续禁欲持续时间都有所提高。这些研究支持了一种戒除奖励干预措施的有效性,并强调了在美沙酮维持治疗与心理社会咨询治疗环境中应用可能产生的不同结果。二次分析表明,早期治疗阳性与阴性尿液筛查在调节戒除奖励的结果方面的重要性,并探讨了干预措施的安全性和成本效益。讨论了在临床实践中使用动机激励方法的意义。