Ichhpujani R L, Chhabra Mala, Mittal Veena, Bhattacharya D, Singh J, Lal Shiv
WHO Collaborating Centre for Rabies Epidemiology, National Institute of Communicable Diseases, 22-Sham Nath Marg, Delhi 110 054.
J Commun Dis. 2006 Dec;38(4):355-61.
Rabies a disease as old as our civilization, continues to be the most feared of all communicable diseases. Despite the availability the state-of-the-art tools which ensure near cent percent protection against rabies, India is the largest contributant to rabies mortality in the world. A multicentric study was carried out from April 2001 to September 2002 with the objective of assessing the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices (KAP) about animal bites and rabies in the general community. The proforma for interviewing the general community was developed and used after field testing. The study was carried out at six selected centres across the country viz. Delhi, Hyderabad, Raipur, Jamnagar, Coonoor and Rajahmundry and was co-ordinated by National Institute of Communicable Diseases (NICD), Delhi, after thorough briefing of designated nodal officers. A total of 1129 (male: female :: 48.5: 51.5) persons in the age group of 18 to 80 years were interviewed in this study. Of these about 751% of the individuals had attended school at some level and rest were illiterates. 68.7% people had heard about rabies. In 60.7% of cases the community associates rabies with dog bite only. Knowledge about appropriate wound toilet was found to be inadequate. Only 360 (31.9%0/) people felt that washing the wound with soap and water was the best option. Application of indigenous products like chillies (11.4%), turmeric (5.6%), lime (6.8%), kerosene oil (2.3%), herbal paste (4.2%) etc was suggested along with visit to occult medicine practitioner (1.5%) as part of the bite wound management. People were not aware of number of injections needed for treatment of animal bites. Multiple reasons viz negligence and ignorance 354 (31.4%), fear of multiple painful injections 365 (32.3%), expensive treatment 169 (15%) and long course requiring daily visits to anti-rabies clinics 73 (6.5%) were cited as reasons for non-compliance of treatment. KAP study suggests that there is need to create awareness amongst the masses regarding epidemiology of the disease and merits of prompt and appropriate post exposure treatment through enhanced IEC activities.
狂犬病是一种与我们的文明一样古老的疾病,仍然是所有传染病中最令人恐惧的。尽管有最先进的工具可确保几乎百分之百预防狂犬病,但印度却是世界上狂犬病死亡人数最多的国家。2001年4月至2002年9月开展了一项多中心研究,目的是评估普通人群对动物咬伤和狂犬病的知识、态度、信念及行为(KAP)。针对普通人群的访谈问卷在经过现场测试后制定并使用。该研究在全国六个选定的中心开展,即德里、海得拉巴、赖布尔、贾姆讷格尔、库努尔和拉贾蒙德里,并由德里的国家传染病研究所(NICD)协调,事先对指定的联络官员进行了全面培训。本研究共访谈了1129名(男性与女性比例为48.5:51.5)年龄在18至80岁之间的人。其中约75.1%的人接受过某种程度的教育,其余为文盲。68.7%的人听说过狂犬病。在60.7%的案例中,社区仅将狂犬病与狗咬伤联系起来。发现关于适当伤口处理的知识不足。只有360人(31.9%)认为用肥皂和水清洗伤口是最佳选择。有人建议在咬伤伤口处理中使用辣椒(11.4%)、姜黄(5.6%)、石灰(6.8%)、煤油(2.3%)、草药膏(4.2%)等本土产品,同时还要去看巫医(1.5%)。人们不知道治疗动物咬伤所需的注射次数。不遵守治疗的原因有多种,包括疏忽和无知354人(31.4%)、害怕多次痛苦的注射365人(32.3%)、治疗费用昂贵169人(15%)以及疗程长需要每天去狂犬病诊所73人(6.5%)。KAP研究表明,有必要通过加强信息、教育和宣传活动,提高大众对该疾病流行病学以及暴露后及时适当治疗益处的认识。