• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

类别学习的发散自编码器(DIVA)模型。

The divergent autoencoder (DIVA) model of category learning.

作者信息

Kutrz Kenneth J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):560-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03196806.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196806
PMID:17972718
Abstract

A novel theoretical approach to human category learning is proposed in which categories are represented as coordinated statistical models of the properties of the members. Key elements of the account are learning to recode inputs as task-constrained principle components and evaluating category membership in terms of model fit-that is, the fidelity of the reconstruction after recoding and decoding the stimulus. The approach is implemented as a computational model called DIVA (for DIVergent Autoencoder), an artificial neural network that uses reconstructive learning to solve N-way classification tasks. DIVA shows good qualitative fits to benchmark human learning data and provides a compelling theoretical alternative to established models.

摘要

本文提出了一种全新的人类类别学习理论方法,其中类别被表示为成员属性的协调统计模型。该理论的关键要素包括学习将输入重新编码为任务约束主成分,并根据模型拟合度(即对刺激进行重新编码和解码后的重建保真度)来评估类别成员资格。该方法被实现为一个名为DIVA(发散自编码器)的计算模型,这是一种利用重建学习来解决N路分类任务的人工神经网络。DIVA对基准人类学习数据显示出良好的定性拟合,并为现有模型提供了一种引人注目的理论替代方案。

相似文献

1
The divergent autoencoder (DIVA) model of category learning.类别学习的发散自编码器(DIVA)模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):560-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03196806.
2
Diversion of attention in everyday concept learning: identification in the service of use.日常概念学习中的注意力转移:为实用而识别。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jan;35(1):1-14. doi: 10.3758/bf03195937.
3
Diagnosticity and prototypicality in category learning: a comparison of inference learning and classification learning.类别学习中的诊断性与典型性:推理学习与分类学习的比较
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):216-26. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.216.
4
Measuring category intuitiveness in unconstrained categorization tasks.在非约束性分类任务中测量类别直观性。
Cognition. 2011 Oct;121(1):83-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
5
Similar to the category, but not the exemplars: A study of generalization.类似于范畴,但非范例:一项关于泛化的研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1312-1323. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1208-1.
6
Structure shapes the representation of a novel category.结构塑造了新类别表述。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Mar;50(3):458-483. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001257. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
7
Learning feature representations with a cost-relevant sparse autoencoder.使用具有成本相关稀疏自编码器学习特征表示。
Int J Neural Syst. 2015 Feb;25(1):1450034. doi: 10.1142/S0129065714500348.
8
Organisation and evocation of the semantic knowledge: a non-abstractive approach.语义知识的组织与唤起:一种非抽象方法。
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):237-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.004.
9
Conceptualizing syntactic categories as semantic categories: Unifying part-of-speech identification and semantics using co-occurrence vector averaging.将句法范畴概念化为语义范畴:使用共现向量平均统一词性识别和语义。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1371-1398. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1118-4.
10
Categorization reaction time, category structure, and category size in semantic memory using artificial categories.使用人工类别对语义记忆中的分类反应时间、类别结构和类别大小进行研究。
Mem Cognit. 1983 May;11(3):228-36. doi: 10.3758/bf03196969.

引用本文的文献

1
A boundedly rational model for category learning.一种用于类别学习的有限理性模型。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 9;15:1477514. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1477514. eCollection 2024.
2
Quantum Circuit Components for Cognitive Decision-Making.用于认知决策的量子电路组件。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Mar 23;25(4):548. doi: 10.3390/e25040548.
3
A Functional Contextual Account of Background Knowledge in Categorization: Implications for Artificial General Intelligence and Cognitive Accounts of General Knowledge.分类中背景知识的功能情境解释:对通用人工智能和常识认知解释的启示。

本文引用的文献

1
Learning to classify integral-dimension stimuli.学习分类整维度刺激。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Jun;3(2):222-6. doi: 10.3758/BF03212422.
2
Six principles for biologically based computational models of cortical cognition.皮质认知的基于生物学的计算模型的六个原则。
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Nov 1;2(11):455-62. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01241-8.
3
A simple procedure for pruning back-propagation trained neural networks.一种用于修剪反向传播训练神经网络的简单方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 2;13:745306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745306. eCollection 2022.
4
The Effect of Feedback on Attention Allocation in Category Learning: An Eye Tracking Study.反馈对类别学习中注意力分配的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 10;11:559334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559334. eCollection 2020.
5
An Active Inference Approach to Modeling Structure Learning: Concept Learning as an Example Case.一种用于建模结构学习的主动推理方法:以概念学习为例。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2020 May 19;14:41. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2020.00041. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparing methods of category learning: Classification versus feature inference.比较类别学习方法:分类与特征推理。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jul;48(5):710-730. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01022-8.
7
Revisiting the linear separability constraint: New implications for theories of human category learning.重新审视线性可分性约束:对人类范畴学习理论的新启示。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Apr;48(3):335-347. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00972-y.
8
Pigeon category learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.鸽子类别学习:重新审视谢泼德、霍夫兰德和詹金斯(1961年)的任务。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(2):174-184. doi: 10.1037/xan0000198. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
Attentional Bias in Human Category Learning: The Case of Deep Learning.人类类别学习中的注意偏向:深度学习的案例
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 13;9:374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00374. eCollection 2018.
10
Similar to the category, but not the exemplars: A study of generalization.类似于范畴,但非范例:一项关于泛化的研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1312-1323. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1208-1.
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1990;1(2):239-42. doi: 10.1109/72.80236.
4
An iterative pruning algorithm for feedforward neural networks.一种用于前馈神经网络的迭代剪枝算法。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1997;8(3):519-31. doi: 10.1109/72.572092.
5
Regularization algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks.与多层网络等效的学习正则化算法。
Science. 1990 Feb 23;247(4945):978-82. doi: 10.1126/science.247.4945.978.
6
Modeling individual differences in cognition.模拟认知中的个体差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):605-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03196751.
7
Thirty-something categorization results explained: selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning.三十多岁年龄段分类结果解析:选择性注意、眼动追踪与类别学习模型
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):811-29. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.811.
8
Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.类别学习中的眼动追踪与选择性注意
Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):1-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Mar 19.
9
Human category learning.人类类别学习。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:149-78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070217.
10
Schematic influences on category learning and recognition memory.对类别学习和识别记忆的示意性影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Dec;133(4):534-53. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.534.