• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

图词干扰效应并非一种斯特鲁普效应。

The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect.

作者信息

Dell'Acqua R, Job R, Peressotti F, Pascali A

机构信息

Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):717-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03196827.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196827
PMID:17972739
Abstract

A psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm was used to isolate the locus of the picture-word interference effect along the chain of processes subtended in name production. Two stimuli were presented sequentially on each trial, separated by a varying stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). The first stimulus, SI, was a tone that required a manual response. The second stimulus, S2, was a picture-word stimulus associated with picture naming. The distractor word was conceptually related to the picture on half of the trials, and unrelated in the other trials. A picture-word interference effect was found at long SOA, but not at short SOA. Such underadditive interaction between SOA and semantic relatedness suggests strongly that the locus of the picture-word interference effect is functionally earlier than the PRP effect locus. The results are discussed in relation to models of word production suggesting the involvement of central mechanisms in the selection of lexical output.

摘要

采用心理不应期(PRP)范式,沿着命名产生过程所涉及的一系列加工环节来分离图词干扰效应的发生位点。每次试验依次呈现两个刺激,二者被不同的刺激呈现间隔(SOA)隔开。第一个刺激S1是一个需要手动反应的音调。第二个刺激S2是与图片命名相关的图词刺激。在一半的试验中,干扰词与图片在概念上相关,而在另一半试验中二者无关。在长SOA时发现了图词干扰效应,但在短SOA时未发现。SOA与语义相关性之间这种非相加性的交互作用强烈表明,图词干扰效应的发生位点在功能上早于PRP效应的发生位点。结合单词产生模型对结果进行了讨论,这些模型表明在词汇输出选择中涉及中枢机制。

相似文献

1
The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect.图词干扰效应并非一种斯特鲁普效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):717-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03196827.
2
Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.图片命名中的语义干扰焦点:来自双重任务表现的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):147-65. doi: 10.1037/a0033745. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
3
Localizing semantic interference from distractor sounds in picture naming: A dual-task study.在图片命名中定位干扰声音的语义干扰:一项双任务研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1909-1916. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1386-5.
4
Task choice and semantic interference in picture naming.图片命名中的任务选择与语义干扰
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 May;157:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
5
Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.与显性命名中语义和 Stroop 样干扰效应相关的事件相关电位和振荡脑反应。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 23;1450:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
6
What Phonological Facilitation Tells about Semantic Interference: A Dual-Task Study.语音促进对语义干扰的揭示:一项双任务研究。
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 6;2:57. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00057. eCollection 2011.
7
My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.天哪!阅读物体名称产生的干扰意味着在图片命名检索过程中存在竞争作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1229-40. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.655699. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
8
Semantic priming over unrelated trials: evidence for different effects in word and picture naming.无关试验中的语义启动:单词和图片命名中不同效应的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):715-25. doi: 10.3758/bf03193590.
9
Semantic picture-word interference is a postperceptual effect.语义图片-词汇干扰是一种后感知效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):301-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0190-x.
10
The word class effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.图词干扰范式中的词类效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jun;63(6):1233-46. doi: 10.1080/17470210903377380. Epub 2009 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT) to Probe the Neural Interaction Between Representations of Speech Planning and Comprehension.使用快速隐形频率标记(RIFT)探究言语规划与理解表征之间的神经交互作用。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Jul 15;6. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00171. eCollection 2025.
2
Does an external distractor interfere with the triggering of item-specific control?外部干扰器是否会干扰特定项目控制的触发?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2025 Jun;51(6):808-825. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001323. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
3
Conflicting Sensory Information Sharpens the Neural Representations of Early Selective Visuospatial Attention.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term consolidation of individual identities leads to Lag-1 sparing.个体身份的短期巩固导致Lag-1保留。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):593-609. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.593.
2
Now you see it, now you don't: on turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task.现在你看到了,现在你又看不到了:在类似斯特鲁普任务中把语义干扰转化为促进作用。
Cortex. 2006 Aug;42(6):790-6. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70419-2.
3
Bidirectional semantic priming in the attentional blink.注意瞬脱中的双向语义启动
冲突的感觉信息能使早期选择性视空间注意力的神经表征更加清晰。
J Neurosci. 2024 Aug 14;44(33):e2012232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2012-23.2024.
4
Role of cognitive control in resolving two types of conflict during spoken word production.认知控制在解决口语产生过程中两种冲突类型中的作用。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2023;38(8):1082-1097. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2202917. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of "in/animates".关于使用图片-单词干扰范式研究的警示:随意使用“有生命/无生命”概念带来的不良后果
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1145884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884. eCollection 2023.
6
Dissociating proactive and reactive control in older adults.老年人前瞻性和反应性控制的分离。
Psychol Aging. 2023 Jun;38(4):323-332. doi: 10.1037/pag0000748. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
7
Target-Target Perceptual Similarity Within the Attentional Blink.注意瞬脱中的目标-目标知觉相似性
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 16;11:551890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551890. eCollection 2020.
8
Is Immediate Processing of Presupposition Triggers Automatic or Capacity-Limited? A Combination of the PRP Approach with a Self-Paced Reading Task.预设触发词的即时处理是自动的还是受容量限制的?PRP方法与自定步速阅读任务的结合。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2020 Apr;49(2):247-273. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09686-3.
9
Semantic interference in the picture-word interference task: Is there a pre-lexical, conceptual contribution to the effect?图片词汇干扰任务中的语义干扰:这种效应是否存在词汇前、概念性的贡献?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):373-378. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01667-w.
10
Does response modality influence conflict? Modelling vocal and manual response Stroop interference.反应模态是否会影响冲突?声乐和手动反应斯特鲁普干扰的建模。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Nov;45(11):2098-2119. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000689. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Jun;12(3):460-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03193788.
4
Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model.检验中央容量共享模型的预测结果。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Aug;31(4):790-802. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.790.
5
On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.关于图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰效应的类别性质。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):125-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03196357.
6
Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing.几乎没有证据表明存在几乎完美的时间共享。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Oct;30(5):795-810. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.795.
7
When more is less: a counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm.少即是多:图-词干扰范式中分心物频率的一种违反直觉的效应。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Jun;132(2):228-52. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.228.
8
A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.双任务表现的中枢容量共享模型。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):3-18. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.29.1.3.
9
Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task.言语行为的目标参照选择:在斯特鲁普任务中对注意力控制进行建模。
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):88-125. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.88.
10
Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production.中央瓶颈对单词生成加工阶段的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1187-99.