Kashefi Kazem, Shelobolina Evgenya S, Elliott W Crawford, Lovley Derek R
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jan;74(1):251-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01580-07. Epub 2007 Nov 2.
Recent studies have suggested that the structural Fe(III) within phyllosilicate minerals, including smectite and illite, is an important electron acceptor for Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms in sedimentary environments at moderate temperatures. The reduction of structural Fe(III) by thermophiles, however, has not previously been described. A wide range of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic Archaea and Bacteria from marine and freshwater environments that are known to reduce poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxides were tested for their ability to reduce structural (octahedrally coordinated) Fe(III) in smectite (SWa-1) as the sole electron acceptor. Two out of the 10 organisms tested, Geoglobus ahangari and Geothermobacterium ferrireducens, were not able to conserve energy to support growth by reduction of Fe(III) in SWa-1 despite the fact that both organisms were originally isolated with solid-phase Fe(III) as the electron acceptor. The other organisms tested were able to grow on SWa-1 and reduced 6.3 to 15.1% of the Fe(III). This is 20 to 50% less than the reported amounts of Fe(III) reduced in the same smectite (SWa-1) by mesophilic Fe(III) reducers. Two organisms, Geothermobacter ehrlichii and archaeal strain 140, produced copious amounts of an exopolysaccharide material, which may have played an active role in the dissolution of the structural iron in SWa-1 smectite. The reduction of structural Fe(III) in SWa-1 by archaeal strain 140 was studied in detail. Microbial Fe(III) reduction was accompanied by an increase in interlayer and octahedral charges and some incorporation of potassium and magnesium into the smectite structure. However, these changes in the major element chemistry of SWa-1 smectite did not result in the formation of an illite-like structure, as reported for a mesophilic Fe(III) reducer. These results suggest that thermophilic Fe(III)-reducing organisms differ in their ability to reduce and solubilize structural Fe(III) in SWa-1 smectite and that SWa-1 is not easily transformed to illite by these organisms.
最近的研究表明,包括蒙脱石和伊利石在内的层状硅酸盐矿物中的结构铁(III),是中温沉积环境中还原铁(III)的微生物的重要电子受体。然而,嗜热菌对结构铁(III)的还原作用此前尚未见报道。我们测试了从海洋和淡水环境中分离出的多种嗜热和超嗜热古菌及细菌,这些微生物已知能还原结晶度较差的铁(III)氧化物,测试它们以蒙脱石(SWa - 1)中的结构(八面体配位)铁(III)作为唯一电子受体时的还原能力。在测试的10种微生物中,有两种,即阿氏地圆菌和嗜热铁还原地杆菌,尽管它们最初都是以固相铁(III)作为电子受体分离得到的,但却无法通过还原SWa - 1中的铁(III)来保存能量以支持生长。其他测试的微生物能够在SWa - 1上生长,并将6.3%至15.1%的铁(III)还原。这比中温铁(III)还原菌在相同蒙脱石(SWa - 1)中还原的铁(III)量少20%至50%。两种微生物,即埃氏嗜热栖热菌和古菌菌株140,产生了大量的胞外多糖物质,这可能在SWa - 1蒙脱石中结构铁的溶解过程中发挥了积极作用。我们详细研究了古菌菌株140对SWa - 1中结构铁(III)的还原作用。微生物对铁(III)的还原伴随着层间电荷和八面体电荷的增加,以及一些钾和镁掺入蒙脱石结构中。然而,SWa - 1蒙脱石主要元素化学的这些变化并没有导致形成类似伊利石的结构,这与中温铁(III)还原菌的情况不同。这些结果表明,嗜热铁(III)还原微生物在还原和溶解SWa - 1蒙脱石中结构铁(III)的能力上存在差异,并且这些微生物不容易将SWa - 1转化为伊利石。