• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刻画目标导向性伸手运动中表现出的选择历史偏差的个体差异。

Characterizing individual differences in selection history bias manifested in goal-directed reaching movements.

作者信息

Zhang Fan, Makwana Mukesh, Heinke Dietmar, Song Joo-Hyun

机构信息

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03068-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-025-03068-9
PMID:40195267
Abstract

Everyday interactions with a complex environment often demand selecting a single target among multiple distractors. A recent framework of attentional control suggests that object selection is influenced not only by perceptual salience and current goals but also by selection history. Here, we examine how this interplay between target and distractor history manifests in individual differences in target selection for goal-directed reaching movements. We employ a priming-of-popout (PoP) paradigm combined with continuous tracking of reaching movements. Participants reach for an odd-colored target among homogeneous distractors while we systematically manipulate the sequence of target and distractor colors from one trial to the next. We record behavioral data such as reach trajectory, initiation latency, and movement time, and calculate attraction scores using the single target reach trajectory as the baseline to evaluate performance across six conditions. For each participant, we determine their maximum attraction score and its timing for each condition. Subsequently, using k-means clustering and t-SNE analysis identifies four distinct clusters as subgroups, indicating different strategies in attentional and action selection with varying degrees of influence from previous target versus distractor feature repetition and their distinct contributions to PoP. Our findings underscore that previous selection history triggers a dynamic interaction between target facilitation and distractor inhibition, resulting in individual differences in target selection strategies for goal-directed actions.

摘要

在复杂环境中的日常互动通常需要在多个干扰物中选择单个目标。最近的注意力控制框架表明,对象选择不仅受感知显著性和当前目标的影响,还受选择历史的影响。在这里,我们研究目标和干扰物历史之间的这种相互作用如何在目标导向的伸手动作的目标选择的个体差异中体现出来。我们采用了弹出式启动(PoP)范式并结合对伸手动作的持续跟踪。参与者在均匀的干扰物中伸手去够一个颜色奇特的目标,同时我们系统地操纵从一次试验到下一次试验的目标和干扰物颜色序列。我们记录诸如伸手轨迹、起始潜伏期和运动时间等行为数据,并使用单个目标伸手轨迹作为基线来计算吸引力分数,以评估六种条件下的表现。对于每个参与者,我们确定他们在每种条件下的最大吸引力分数及其时间。随后,使用k均值聚类和t-SNE分析将四个不同的聚类识别为亚组,表明在注意力和动作选择方面的不同策略,受到先前目标与干扰物特征重复的不同程度影响以及它们对PoP的不同贡献。我们的研究结果强调,先前的选择历史会引发目标促进和干扰物抑制之间的动态相互作用,从而导致目标导向行动的目标选择策略存在个体差异。

相似文献

1
Characterizing individual differences in selection history bias manifested in goal-directed reaching movements.刻画目标导向性伸手运动中表现出的选择历史偏差的个体差异。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03068-9.
2
Continuous action with a neurobiologically inspired computational approach reveals the dynamics of selection history.连续动作与神经生物学启发的计算方法揭示了选择历史的动态。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jul 17;19(7):e1011283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011283. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Target selection biases from recent experience transfer across effectors.来自近期经验的靶点选择偏差会在效应器之间传递。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Feb;78(2):415-26. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1011-5.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Target selection for visually guided reaching in macaque.猕猴中视觉引导抓握的目标选择
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jan;99(1):14-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.01106.2007. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
6
Dissociable effects of salience on attention and goal-directed action.显著性对注意力和目标导向行为的可分离效应。
Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 3;25(15):2040-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.029. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
7
Eye-hand coordination during target selection in a pop-out visual search.在弹出式视觉搜索中进行目标选择时的眼手协调。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Nov;102(5):2681-92. doi: 10.1152/jn.91352.2008. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
8
Reaching movements are attracted by stimuli that signal reward.伸手动作会被发出奖励信号的刺激所吸引。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Nov;82(8):3804-3810. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02120-0.
9
Feature intertrial priming biases attentional priority: Evidence from the capture-probe paradigm.特征试验间启动会影响注意优先级:来自捕获-探针范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Aug;49(8):1145-1157. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001135. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
10
The effects of saliency on manual reach trajectories and reach target selection.显著性对手动伸展轨迹和伸展目标选择的影响。
Vision Res. 2015 Aug;113(Pt B):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Trichotomy revisited: A monolithic theory of attentional control.重新审视三分法:注意控制的整体理论。
Vision Res. 2024 Apr;217:108366. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108366. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
2
Effector-independent Representations Guide Sequential Target Selection Biases in Action.效应器独立的表示指导动作中连续目标选择的偏向。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Mar 1;36(3):492-507. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02102.
3
Continuous action with a neurobiologically inspired computational approach reveals the dynamics of selection history.连续动作与神经生物学启发的计算方法揭示了选择历史的动态。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jul 17;19(7):e1011283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011283. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Rethinking Vision and Action.重新思考视觉与行动
Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:59-86. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-021422-043229.
5
Does temperament have a differential effect on Inhibition of Return (IOR)?气质是否对返回抑制(IOR)有差异影响?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Nov;221:103439. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103439. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
6
Disentangling Trait-Like Between-Individual vs. State-Like Within-Individual Effects in Studying the Mechanisms of Change in CBT.在研究认知行为疗法(CBT)的改变机制中,厘清个体间特质样效应与个体内状态样效应
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 21;11:609585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.609585. eCollection 2020.
7
Comparing multiple comparisons: practical guidance for choosing the best multiple comparisons test.比较多重比较:选择最佳多重比较检验的实用指南。
PeerJ. 2020 Dec 4;8:e10387. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10387. eCollection 2020.
8
Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory.人工神经网络揭示了元认知监测记忆的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220526. eCollection 2019.
9
Priming of Pop-out does not provide reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention: Evidence from a large-scale online study.凸显启动效应并不能为选择性注意中的目标激活和干扰项抑制提供可靠的测量方法:来自一项大规模在线研究的证据。
Vision Res. 2018 Aug;149:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.10.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
10
Target activation and distractor inhibition underlie priming of pop-out: A response to Dent (this issue).目标激活和干扰抑制是突显启动效应的基础:对登特(本期)的回应。
Vision Res. 2018 Aug;149:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 30.