Liao Ke, Walker Mark F, Joshi Anand, Reschke Millard, Leigh R John
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(4):553-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1181-z. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
Prior studies of the human translational vestibulo-ocular reflex (tVOR) report that eye rotations amount to less than 60% of those required to keep the eyes pointed at a stationary visual target, unlike the angular VOR (aVOR) which is optimized to maintain stable gaze. Our first goal was to determine if the performance of the tVOR improves when head translations are combined with head rotations in ambient lighting. A second goal was to measure tVOR during vertical head translations (bob), which has not received systematic study. We measured tVOR alone and in combination with the aVOR in 20 normal human subjects, aged 25-72 years, as they sat on a moving platform that bobbed at 2.0 Hz while rotating horizontally (yaw) at 1.0 Hz. When subjects viewed a visual target at 2 m, median "compensation gain" (eye rotational velocity/required eye rotational velocity to maintain foveal target fixation) was 0.52 during pure bob and 0.59 during combined bob-yaw; during viewing of a near target at approximately 17 cm, compensation gain was 0.58 for pure bob and 0.60 for combined bob-yaw. Mean phase lag of eye-in-head velocity for the tVOR was approximately 19 degrees with respect to the ideal compensatory response, irrespective of whether translation was accompanied by rotation. Thus, the tVOR changed only slightly during translation-rotation versus pure translation, and our subjects' ocular rotations remained at about 60% of those required to point the eyes at the target. Comparison of response during binocular or monocular viewing, and ambient or reduced illumination, indicated that relative image motion between the target and background was an important determinant of tVOR behavior. We postulate that tVOR evolved not to stabilize the image of the target on the fovea, but rather to minimize retinal image motion between objects lying in different planes, in order to optimize motion parallax information.
先前关于人类平移性前庭眼反射(tVOR)的研究报告称,与优化以保持稳定注视的角前庭眼反射(aVOR)不同,眼球旋转幅度不到使眼睛指向固定视觉目标所需旋转幅度的60%。我们的首要目标是确定在环境光线下头部平移与头部旋转相结合时,tVOR的表现是否会改善。第二个目标是测量垂直头部平移(上下摆动)过程中的tVOR,这尚未得到系统研究。我们在20名年龄在25至72岁的正常人类受试者坐在一个移动平台上时,测量了单独的tVOR以及与aVOR相结合的情况,该平台以2.0赫兹上下摆动,同时以1.0赫兹水平旋转(偏航)。当受试者观看2米处的视觉目标时,在单纯上下摆动期间,中位“补偿增益”(眼球旋转速度/保持中央凹目标固定所需的眼球旋转速度)为0.52,在上下摆动与偏航相结合期间为0.59;在观看约17厘米处的近目标时,单纯上下摆动的补偿增益为0.58,上下摆动与偏航相结合时为0.60。tVOR的眼球在头部中的速度相对于理想补偿反应的平均相位滞后约为19度,无论平移是否伴有旋转。因此,与单纯平移相比,在平移 - 旋转过程中tVOR变化不大,我们的受试者的眼球旋转仍保持在使眼睛指向目标所需旋转幅度的约60%。双眼或单眼观看以及环境光或弱光条件下反应的比较表明,目标与背景之间的相对图像运动是tVOR行为的一个重要决定因素。我们推测,tVOR的进化并非为了稳定中央凹上目标的图像,而是为了最小化位于不同平面的物体之间的视网膜图像运动,以优化运动视差信息。