Chamberlain Sean T, Hale Bruce D
Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2007 Jun;20(2):197-207. doi: 10.1080/10615800701288572.
This study considered relationships between the intensity and directional aspects of competitive state anxiety as measured by the modified Competitive Sport Anxiety Inventory-2(D) (Jones & Swain, 1992) in a sample of 12 experienced male golfers. Anxiety and performance scores from identical putting tasks performed under three different anxiety-manipulated competitive conditions were used to assess both the predictions of Multidimensional Anxiety Theory (MAT; Martens et al., 1990) and the relative value of intensity and direction in explaining performance variance. A within-subjects regression analysis of the intra-individual data showed partial support for the three MAT hypotheses. Cognitive anxiety intensity demonstrated a negative linear relationship with performance, somatic anxiety intensity showed a curvilinear relationship with performance, and self-confidence intensity revealed a positive linear relation. Cognitive directional anxiety illustrated a positive linear relationship with putting performance. Multiple regression analyses indicated that direction (42% of variance) was a better predictor of performance than intensity (22%).
本研究考察了在12名经验丰富的男性高尔夫球手样本中,通过修订后的《竞技运动焦虑量表-2(D版)》(琼斯和斯温,1992年)测量的竞技状态焦虑的强度和方向性之间的关系。在三种不同的焦虑操控竞争条件下进行相同的推杆任务所获得的焦虑和表现分数,被用于评估多维焦虑理论(MAT;马滕斯等人,1990年)的预测,以及强度和方向性在解释表现差异方面的相对价值。对个体内数据进行的受试者内回归分析为多维焦虑理论的三个假设提供了部分支持。认知焦虑强度与表现呈负线性关系,躯体焦虑强度与表现呈曲线关系,而自信强度则呈正线性关系。认知方向性焦虑与推杆表现呈正线性关系。多元回归分析表明,方向性(解释方差的42%)比强度(解释方差的22%)是更好的表现预测指标。