• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在理解叙事中嵌入的反事实时取消更新。

Canceling updating in the comprehension of counterfactuals embedded in narratives.

作者信息

de Vega Manuel, Urrutia Mabel, Riffo Bernardo

机构信息

Departamento de Psicología Cognitiva, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2007 Sep;35(6):1410-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03193611.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193611
PMID:18035637
Abstract

Participants were given counterfactual sentences--for example, "If Mary had won the lottery she would have bought a Mercedes car"--or factual sentences--for example, "Because Mary won the lottery, she bought a Mercedes car"--embedded in short narratives. Reading times showed that readers were immediately sensitive to the special status of counterfactual information (Experiment 1). In addition, probe-recognition latencies demonstrated that old information was more accessible in counterfactual than in factual stories, and new information was equally accessible in both kinds of stories (Experiment 2). However, after reading additional clauses, new information became less accessible in counterfactual than in factual stories (Experiment 3). These results suggest that counterfactual events are momentarily represented but are later suppressed and the readers' attention goes back to previous events in the story.

摘要

研究参与者会看到嵌入在简短叙述中的反事实句子(例如,“如果玛丽中了彩票,她就会买一辆奔驰车”)或事实性句子(例如,“因为玛丽中了彩票,所以她买了一辆奔驰车”)。阅读时间表明,读者会立即对反事实信息的特殊地位产生敏感(实验1)。此外,探测识别潜伏期表明,在反事实故事中旧信息比在事实性故事中更容易获取,而新信息在两种故事中获取的难易程度相当(实验2)。然而,在阅读了额外的从句后,反事实故事中的新信息比事实性故事中的新信息更难获取(实验3)。这些结果表明,反事实事件会被暂时呈现,但随后会被抑制,读者的注意力会回到故事中之前的事件上。

相似文献

1
Canceling updating in the comprehension of counterfactuals embedded in narratives.在理解叙事中嵌入的反事实时取消更新。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Sep;35(6):1410-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03193611.
2
Understanding counterfactuals in discourse modulates ERP and oscillatory γ rhythms in the EEG.理解话语中的反事实条件会调节 EEG 中的 ERP 和振荡 γ 节律。
Brain Res. 2012 May 21;1455:40-55. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.032. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
3
Examining the cognitive costs of counterfactual language comprehension: Evidence from ERPs.考察反事实语言理解的认知成本:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Brain Res. 2015 Oct 5;1622:252-69. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
4
Repeating phrases across unrelated narratives: evidence of text repetition effects.在不相关叙述中重复短语:文本重复效应的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1588-99. doi: 10.3758/bf03193493.
5
Revising what readers know: updating text representations during narrative comprehension.修正读者已知内容:叙事理解过程中更新文本表征
Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):2019-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03192934.
6
Grammatical aspect, lexical aspect, and event duration constrain the availability of events in narratives.语法体、词汇体和事件持续时间限制了叙事中事件的可及性。
Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):212-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
7
When you and I share perspectives: pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension.当你我共享视角时:代词在叙事理解过程中调节视角采择。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02249.x. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
8
Counterfactuals in action: an fMRI study of counterfactual sentences describing physical effort.反事实推理在行动:一项 fMRI 研究反事实句子描述体力活动。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3663-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
9
Attentional focus affects how events are segmented and updated in narrative reading.注意力焦点会影响叙事性阅读中事件的分割与更新方式。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Aug;45(6):940-955. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0707-2.
10
What Is the Story with Narratives? How Using Narratives in Journalism Changes Health Behavior.叙事的故事是什么?新闻报道中使用叙事如何改变健康行为。
Health Commun. 2018 Sep;33(9):1151-1157. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1333562. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Bidirectional Relation Between Counterfactual Thinking and Closeness, Controllability, and Exceptionality.反事实思维与接近性、可控性和特殊性之间的双向关系。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 9;13:732870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.732870. eCollection 2022.
2
A Review of Functions of Speculative Thinking.思辨思维的功能综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 15;12:728946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728946. eCollection 2021.
3
"Looking at" Negation: Faster Processing for Symbolic Rather Than Iconic Representations.“看”否定:符号表示比图像表示处理更快。

本文引用的文献

1
Précis of The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality.《理性想象:人们如何创造现实的替代方案》摘要
Behav Brain Sci. 2007 Dec;30(5-6):439-53; discussion 453-76. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X07002579. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
2
Counterfactual and semifactual conditionals prime alternative possibilities.反事实条件句和半事实条件句引发了其他可能性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1149-54. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1149.
3
Age and inhibition: the retrieval of situation models.年龄与抑制:情境模型的提取
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Dec;50(6):1417-1436. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09797-w. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
4
Autistic Adults are Not Impaired at Maintaining or Switching Between Counterfactual and Factual Worlds: An ERP Study.自闭症成人在维持或切换反事实与事实世界方面并未受损:一项 ERP 研究。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Jan;52(1):349-360. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04939-4. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
5
Neural Correlates of Modal Displacement and Discourse-Updating under (Un)Certainty.模态转换和不确定条件下话语更新的神经关联。
eNeuro. 2021 Jan 14;8(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0290-20.2020. Print 2021 Jan-Feb.
6
The Comprehension of Counterfactual Conditionals: Evidence From Eye-Tracking in the Visual World Paradigm.反事实条件句的理解:来自视觉世界范式中眼动追踪的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 14;10:1172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01172. eCollection 2019.
7
Understanding Counterfactuality: A Review of Experimental Evidence for the Dual Meaning of Counterfactuals.理解反事实性:关于反事实陈述双重含义的实验证据综述
Lang Linguist Compass. 2016 Feb;10(2):49-65. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12175. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
8
Processing counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals: an fMRI investigation.处理反事实和假设条件:一项 fMRI 研究。
Neuroimage. 2013 May 15;72:265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.060. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
9
Reasoning as we read: establishing the probability of causal conditionals.阅读中的推理:确立因果条件句的概率。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Jan;41(1):152-8. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0250-0.
10
Causal conditionals and counterfactuals.因果条件句与反事实条件句。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Sep;141(1):54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Sep;60(5):P276-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.5.p276.
4
Only spontaneous counterfactual thinking is impaired in patients with prefrontal cortex lesions.只有前额叶皮质受损的患者会出现自发反事实思维障碍。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):723-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.03.013. Epub 2005 Apr 25.
5
On doing two things at once: temporal constraints on actions in language comprehension.关于同时做两件事:语言理解中动作的时间限制。
Mem Cognit. 2004 Oct;32(7):1033-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03196879.
6
Perception of motion affects language processing.运动感知会影响语言处理。
Cognition. 2005 Jan;94(3):B79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.005.
7
Reality compared with its alternatives: age differences in judgments of regret and relief.现实与其替代方案的比较:后悔与宽慰判断中的年龄差异。
Dev Psychol. 2004 Sep;40(5):764-75. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.764.
8
The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in the experience of regret.眶额皮质在后悔体验中的作用。
Science. 2004 May 21;304(5674):1167-70. doi: 10.1126/science.1094550.
9
Updating situation models.更新情境模型。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):283-8; discussion 289-91. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.283.
10
Counterfactual cognitive deficit in persons with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者的反事实认知缺陷。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;74(8):1065-70. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.8.1065.