Luke Nancy, Munshi Kaivan
Brown University.
J Dev Econ. 2007 Jul;83(2):256-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.07.005.
This paper assesses the role of social affiliation, measured by caste, in shaping investments in child health. The special setting that we have chosen for the analysis - tea estates in the South Indian High Range - allows us to control nonparametrically for differences in income, access to health services, and patterns of morbidity across low caste and high caste households. In this controlled setting, low caste households spend more on their children's health than high caste households, reversing the pattern we would expect to find elsewhere in India. Moreover, health expenditures do not vary by gender within either caste group, in contrast once again with the male preference documented throughout the country. A simple explanation, based on differences in the returns to human capital across castes in the tea estates is proposed to explain these striking results.
本文评估了以种姓衡量的社会归属在塑造儿童健康投资方面的作用。我们选择用于分析的特殊环境——印度南部高地的茶园——使我们能够非参数地控制低种姓和高种姓家庭在收入、获得医疗服务的机会以及发病模式方面的差异。在这种可控环境下,低种姓家庭在子女健康方面的支出比高种姓家庭更多,这与我们在印度其他地方预期会发现的模式相反。此外,与全国普遍存在的男性偏好再次形成对比的是,在任何一个种姓群体中,医疗支出都不会因性别而有所不同。基于茶园中不同种姓的人力资本回报差异,提出了一个简单的解释来阐释这些惊人的结果。