Abbott K, Klarenaar P, Donaldson A, Sherker S
Youthsafe, Moorong SpinalUnit, Royal Rehabilitation Centre, Sydney, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;42(6):460-5. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.041467. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
To evaluate a sports safety-focused risk-management training programme.
Controlled before and after test.
Four community soccer associations in Sydney, Australia.
76 clubs (32 intervention, 44 control) at baseline, and 67 clubs (27 intervention, 40 control) at post-season and 12-month follow-ups.
SafeClub, a sports safety-focused risk-management training programme (3x2 hour sessions) based on adult-learning principles and injury-prevention concepts and models.
Changes in mean policy, infrastructure and overall safety scores as measured using a modified version of the Sports Safety Audit Tool.
There was no significant difference in the mean policy, infrastructure and overall safety scores of intervention and control clubs at baseline. Intervention clubs achieved higher post-season mean policy (11.9 intervention vs 7.5 controls), infrastructure (15.2 vs 10.3) and overall safety (27.0 vs 17.8) scores than did controls. These differences were greater at the 12-month follow-up: policy (16.4 vs 7.6); infrastructure (24.7 vs 10.7); and overall safety (41.1 vs 18.3). General linear modelling indicated that intervention clubs achieved statistically significantly higher policy (p<0.001), infrastructure (p<0.001) and overall safety (p<0.001) scores compared with control clubs at the post-season and 12-month follow-ups. There was also a significant linear interaction of time and group for all three scores: policy (p<0.001), infrastructure (p<0.001) and overall safety (p<0.001).
SafeClub effectively assisted community soccer clubs to improve their sports safety activities, particularly the foundations and processes for good risk-management practice, in a sustainable way.
评估一项以运动安全为重点的风险管理培训计划。
前后对照试验。
澳大利亚悉尼的四个社区足球协会。
基线时76个俱乐部（32个干预组，44个对照组），赛季后和12个月随访时67个俱乐部（27个干预组，40个对照组）。
SafeClub，一项以运动安全为重点的风险管理培训计划（3次，每次2小时课程），基于成人学习原则以及 injury-prevention concepts and models（此处原文有误，推测可能是injury-prevention concepts and methods，译为“伤害预防概念和方法”）。
使用改良版运动安全审计工具测量的政策、基础设施和整体安全得分的均值变化。
基线时，干预组和对照组俱乐部在政策、基础设施和整体安全得分均值上无显著差异。干预组俱乐部在赛季后的政策（干预组11.9分，对照组7.5分）、基础设施（15.2分对10.3分）和整体安全（27.0分对17.8分）得分高于对照组。在12个月随访时，这些差异更大：政策（16.4分对7.6分）；基础设施（24.7分对10.7分）；整体安全（41.1分对18.3分）。一般线性模型表明，与对照组俱乐部相比，干预组俱乐部在赛季后和12个月随访时在政策（p<0.001）、基础设施（p<0.001）和整体安全（p<0.001）得分上具有统计学显著更高的分数。对于所有三个得分，时间和组之间也存在显著的线性交互作用：政策（p<0.001）、基础设施（p<0.001）和整体安全（p<0.001）。
SafeClub有效地帮助社区足球俱乐部以可持续的方式改善其运动安全活动，特别是良好风险管理实践的基础和流程。
