Sarkadi Anna, Kristiansson Robert, Oberklaid Frank, Bremberg Sven
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Acta Paediatr. 2008 Feb;97(2):153-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00572.x. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
This systematic review aims to describe longitudinal evidence on the effects of father involvement on children's developmental outcomes.
Father involvement was conceptualized as accessibility (cohabitation), engagement, responsibility or other complex measures of involvement. Both biological fathers and father figures were included. We searched all major databases from the first dates. Data on father involvement had to be generated at least 1 year before measuring offspring outcomes.
N = 24 publications were included in the overview: 22 of these described positive effects of father involvement, whereof 16 studies had controlled for SES and 11 concerned the study population as a whole [five socio-economic status (SES)-controlled]. There is certain evidence that cohabitation with the mother and her male partner is associated with less externalising behavioural problems. Active and regular engagement with the child predicts a range of positive outcomes, although no specific form of engagement has been shown to yield better outcomes than another. Father engagement seems to have differential effects on desirable outcomes by reducing the frequency of behavioural problems in boys and psychological problems in young women, and enhancing cognitive development, while decreasing delinquency and economic disadvantage in low SES families.
There is evidence to support the positive influence of father engagement on offspring social, behavioural and psychological outcomes. Although the literature only provides sufficient basis for engagement (direct interaction with the child) as the specific form of 'effective' father involvement, there is enough support to urge both professionals and policy makers to improve circumstances for involved fathering.
本系统评价旨在描述父亲参与对儿童发育结果影响的纵向证据。
父亲参与被概念化为可及性(同居)、参与度、责任感或其他复杂的参与度衡量指标。亲生父亲和父亲角色均包括在内。我们从最早日期开始检索所有主要数据库。关于父亲参与的数据必须在测量后代结果前至少1年生成。
综述纳入了N = 24篇出版物:其中22篇描述了父亲参与的积极影响,其中16项研究控制了社会经济地位(SES),11项涉及整个研究人群[五项控制了社会经济地位(SES)]。有一定证据表明,与母亲及其男性伴侣同居与较少的外化行为问题相关。积极且定期地与孩子互动预示着一系列积极结果,尽管尚未表明哪种具体互动形式能产生比其他形式更好的结果。父亲的参与似乎对理想结果有不同影响,即减少男孩的行为问题频率和年轻女性的心理问题,促进认知发展,同时减少低SES家庭中的犯罪和经济劣势。
有证据支持父亲参与对后代社会、行为和心理结果的积极影响。尽管文献仅为作为“有效”父亲参与的具体形式的互动(与孩子直接互动)提供了充分依据,但有足够支持促使专业人员和政策制定者改善父亲参与的环境。