Wintermark Max, Lau Benison C, Chien Jeffrey, Arora Sandeep
Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA.
Neuroradiology. 2008 Mar;50(3):227-36. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0336-8. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
Dynamic perfusion-CT (PCT) with deconvolution requires an arterial input function (AIF) for postprocessing. In clinical settings, the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) is often chosen for simplicity. The goals of this study were to determine how the AIF selection influences PCT results in acute stroke patients and whether the ACA is an appropriate default AIF.
We retrospectively identified consecutive patients suspected of hemispheric stroke of less than 48 h duration who were evaluated on admission by PCT. PCT datasets were postprocessed using multiple AIF, and cerebral blood volume (CBV) and flow (CBF), and mean transit time (MTT) values were measured in the corresponding territories. Results from corresponding territories in the same patients were compared using paired t-tests. The volumes of infarct core and tissue at risk obtained with different AIFs were compared to the final infarct volume.
Of 113 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 55 with stroke were considered for analysis. The MTT values obtained with an "ischemic" AIF tended to be shorter (P=0.055) and the CBF values higher (P=0.108) than those obtained using a "nonischemic" AIF. CBV values were not influenced by the selection of the AIF. No statistically significant difference was observed between the size of the PCT infarct core (P=0.121) and tissue at risk (P=0.178), regardless of AIF selection.
In acute stroke patients, the selection of the AIF has no statistically significant impact of the PCT results; standardization of the PCT postprocessing using the ACA as the default AIF is adequate.
使用去卷积的动态灌注CT(PCT)进行后处理需要动脉输入函数(AIF)。在临床环境中,为简便起见通常选择大脑前动脉(ACA)。本研究的目的是确定AIF的选择如何影响急性卒中患者的PCT结果,以及ACA是否为合适的默认AIF。
我们回顾性地确定了连续的、疑似半球卒中且病程小于48小时的患者,这些患者入院时接受了PCT评估。使用多种AIF对PCT数据集进行后处理,并在相应区域测量脑血容量(CBV)、脑血流量(CBF)和平均通过时间(MTT)值。使用配对t检验比较同一患者相应区域的结果。将不同AIF获得的梗死核心和风险组织体积与最终梗死体积进行比较。
在符合纳入标准的113例患者中,55例卒中患者被纳入分析。与使用“非缺血性”AIF获得的值相比,使用“缺血性”AIF获得的MTT值往往更短(P=0.055),CBF值更高(P=0.108)。CBV值不受AIF选择的影响。无论AIF如何选择,PCT梗死核心大小(P=0.121)和风险组织大小(P=0.178)之间均未观察到统计学显著差异。
在急性卒中患者中,AIF的选择对PCT结果无统计学显著影响;以ACA作为默认AIF对PCT后处理进行标准化是足够的。