Adgate John L, Ramachandran Gurumurthy, Cho Sook Ja, Ryan Andrew D, Grengs Jason
Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnessota, USA.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;18(4):430-40. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500638. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
Allergens in house dust are risk factors for asthma causation and exacerbation, and asthma interventions often focus on exposure reduction using methods that may not be sustainable over time in low-income communities. A randomized controlled trial with up to six home visits was used to evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions focused on reducing dust loading and allergen concentrations in 47 low-income inner-city households in Minneapolis, MN. The interventions, which included education and relatively inexpensive cleaning procedures, were developed using a community-based participatory consultation process with focus groups held in English, Somali, and Spanish to incorporate community feedback from participants into protocols and study design decisions. Change in levels of cat, cockroach, dust mite, and culturable fungi as well as overall dust loading were evaluated by measuring the difference in concentrations before and after the cleaning intervention, and mixed models were used to assess the effect of education and cleaning on baseline allergen levels during the final three home visits. The cleaning intervention significantly lowered dust loading in all households and culturable fungi levels in single family homes, reduced cat allergen concentrations in homes with cats, but had no significant effect on cockroach allergen levels. The cleaning intervention also modestly decreased the frequency of observed allergen concentrations above suggested health benchmarks for cat, cockroach, and fungi. The cleaning and education interventions had similar effects on baseline allergen levels measured during subsequent home visits; both interventions significantly reduced baseline levels of cat and fungal allergens observed in pre-cleaning samples, but had no significant effect on cockroach allergen levels. Overall, the cleaning intervention modestly reduced potential exposure to risk factors associated with asthma mortality and morbidity in a way that can be implemented by most homeowners or renters, independent of education, income, or the ability to speak English.
室内灰尘中的过敏原是导致哮喘和加重哮喘病情的风险因素,而哮喘干预措施通常侧重于采用一些随着时间推移在低收入社区可能无法持续的方法来减少接触。一项随机对照试验进行了多达六次家访,以评估两种干预措施在明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市47户低收入市中心家庭中减少灰尘负荷和过敏原浓度的有效性。这些干预措施包括教育和相对便宜的清洁程序,是通过基于社区的参与式咨询过程制定的,举行了英语、索马里语和西班牙语的焦点小组讨论,以便将参与者的社区反馈纳入方案和研究设计决策中。通过测量清洁干预前后浓度的差异,评估猫、蟑螂、尘螨和可培养真菌水平以及总体灰尘负荷的变化,并使用混合模型评估在最后三次家访期间教育和清洁对基线过敏原水平的影响。清洁干预显著降低了所有家庭的灰尘负荷以及独栋房屋中可培养真菌的水平,降低了养猫家庭中猫过敏原的浓度,但对蟑螂过敏原水平没有显著影响。清洁干预还适度降低了观察到的猫、蟑螂和真菌过敏原浓度高于建议健康基准的频率。清洁和教育干预对后续家访期间测量的基线过敏原水平有类似影响;两种干预措施都显著降低了清洁前样本中观察到的猫和真菌过敏原的基线水平,但对蟑螂过敏原水平没有显著影响。总体而言,清洁干预适度降低了与哮喘死亡率和发病率相关的风险因素的潜在暴露,这种方式大多数房主或租户都可以实施,与教育、收入或说英语的能力无关。