Ortega-Deballon P, Cheynel N, Benoit L, Di Giacomo G, Favre J P, Rat P
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Thoracique et Cancérologique, CHU du Bocage - Dijon, France.
J Chir (Paris). 2007 Sep-Oct;144(5):409-13. doi: 10.1016/s0021-7697(07)73996-0.
To analyze our experience with biliary injuries during cholecystectomy in order to determine associated risk factors, morbidity, and results after reconstruction.
Review of the series of patients referred to our department for biliary injury during cholecystectomy over a 9-year period. Items regarding the type of lesion, risk factors, management, morbidity, and late results were recorded.
Fifteen patients were referred to our department for bile duct injury during cholecystectomy between 1997 and 2005 (14 by laparoscopy and four by laparotomy; nine women and nine men). The main surgical indication was biliary colic (n=8). Three patients were operated on in an emergency setting (for acute cholecystitis). In nine patients the gallbladder wall was inflammatory. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in nine patients, but revealed just one injury. Lateral injury to the bile duct was the most frequent type of lesion. In nine patients, the injury was detected intraoperatively and a biliary drainage was left in place; five of them had a synchronic repair and three required later reconstruction. Nine patients had a delayed identification of biliary injury; six of them required a biliodigestive anastomosis. Two patients died, three had several episodes of acute cholangitis after reconstruction and two presented incisional hernia.
An inflammatory environment is the main risk factor for biliary injury during cholecystectomy. Bile duct injury is more frequent with laparoscopic cholecystectomy but can also occur with an open approach. Intraoperative cholangiography does not prevent biliary injuries nor detect them accurately. Biliary drainage can reduce morbidity for intraoperatively detected injuries and may be a sensitive approach for the surgeon with no hepatobiliary experience. Morbidity is increased in patients with delayed identification of the injury.
分析我们在胆囊切除术中处理胆管损伤的经验,以确定相关危险因素、发病率及重建后的结果。
回顾9年间因胆囊切除术中胆管损伤转诊至我科的一系列患者。记录有关损伤类型、危险因素、处理方式、发病率及远期结果的各项内容。
1997年至2005年间,15例患者因胆囊切除术中胆管损伤转诊至我科(14例为腹腔镜手术,4例为开腹手术;9例女性,9例男性)。主要手术指征为胆绞痛(n = 8)。3例患者在急诊情况下接受手术(急性胆囊炎)。9例患者胆囊壁有炎症。9例患者术中行胆管造影,但仅发现1例损伤。胆管侧壁损伤是最常见的损伤类型。9例患者术中发现损伤并留置胆管引流;其中5例同期进行修复,3例后期需要重建。9例患者胆管损伤发现延迟;其中6例需要行胆肠吻合术。2例患者死亡,3例重建后发生多次急性胆管炎,2例出现切口疝。
炎症环境是胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的主要危险因素。胆管损伤在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中更常见,但开腹手术也可发生。术中胆管造影不能预防胆管损伤,也不能准确检测出损伤。胆管引流可降低术中发现损伤的发病率,对于无肝胆经验的外科医生可能是一种敏感的方法。损伤发现延迟的患者发病率增加。