Sun Ping, Unger Jennifer B, Guo Qian, Gong Jie, Ma Huiyan, Palmer Paula H, Chou Chih-Ping, Li Yan, Sussman Steve, Ritt-Olson Anamara, Xiao Lin, Johnson Carl Anderson
Institute for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention Research and Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Nov;9 Suppl 4:S599-609. doi: 10.1080/14622200701697653.
Smoking prevention programs based on social influences have reduced smoking prevalence among youth. However, these effects have not been replicated consistently. It is possible that individuals and populations with different dispositional and behavioral characteristics will experience different program effects. This study explored a possible moderation of program effect by comorbidity between depression and smoking (CoM). Data for this analysis were from 2,450 seventh-grade youth (51% boys) who participated in the Wuhan (China) Smoking Prevention Trial (WSPT). WSPT was a randomized, controlled, 14-session, middle-school-based smoking prevention trial. Baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys were administered. The moderation effect between the program and CoM was tested on 1-year change in recent smoking. The CoM indicator was defined dichotomously as monthly cigarette use and high in depression level (among the top 20% in the sample). At baseline, a total of 26 girls and 60 boys were identified to have CoM. Among boys (but not girls), CoM significantly moderated the program effect on recent smoking (p = .01). The program effect among boys with CoM was 4.17 (95% CI 1.47-11.76) times larger than those without CoM. Among boys with CoM, the odds ratio of recent smoking was 0.18 (95% CI 0.06-0.55) for program vs. control condition. Among those without CoM, the program did not reduce the odds of recent smoking significantly (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.37-1.48). The study demonstrated that smoking prevention program effects can vary with individual characteristics, in this case comorbidity between depression and smoking. These findings may help explain the inconsistency in program effects across studies and populations. The findings also may contribute to the design of future programs to address the needs of defined populations and individuals with specific characteristics.
基于社会影响的吸烟预防项目降低了青少年中的吸烟率。然而,这些效果并未得到一致的重现。具有不同性格和行为特征的个体及人群可能会有不同的项目效果。本研究探讨了抑郁与吸烟共病(CoM)是否可能调节项目效果。该分析的数据来自2450名七年级青少年(51%为男孩),他们参与了武汉(中国)吸烟预防试验(WSPT)。WSPT是一项随机、对照、为期14节的基于中学的吸烟预防试验。进行了基线调查和1年随访调查。在近期吸烟的1年变化情况上测试了项目与CoM之间的调节效应。CoM指标被二分定义为每月吸烟且抑郁水平高(在样本的前20%中)。在基线时,共识别出26名女孩和60名男孩患有CoM。在男孩中(而非女孩中),CoM显著调节了项目对近期吸烟的效果(p = 0.01)。患有CoM的男孩的项目效果比未患CoM的男孩大4.17倍(95%置信区间1.47 - 11.76)。在患有CoM的男孩中,项目组与对照组相比近期吸烟的优势比为0.18(95%置信区间0.06 - 0.55)。在未患CoM的男孩中,该项目并未显著降低近期吸烟的几率(优势比 = 0.74,95%置信区间0.37 - 1.48)。该研究表明,吸烟预防项目的效果可能因个体特征而异,在本案例中即抑郁与吸烟的共病情况。这些发现可能有助于解释不同研究和人群中项目效果的不一致性。这些发现也可能有助于未来项目的设计,以满足特定人群和具有特定特征个体的需求。