Johnson C Anderson, Cen Steven, Gallaher Peggy, Palmer Paula H, Xiao Lin, Ritt-Olson Anamara, Unger Jennifer B
Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Alhambra, CA 91803, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jun;16(6):1043-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0067.
School-based smoking prevention programs sometimes fail in unexpected ways. This study tests the hypotheses that both social/cultural contexts and individual dispositional characteristics may interact with program content to produce effects that are variable in potentially predictable ways.
Students in 24 culturally heterogeneous or primarily Hispanic/Latino middle schools (N = 3,157 6th graders) received a multicultural collectivist-framed social influences (SI) program, an individualist-framed SI program, or a control condition. Three-way linear and nonlinear interactions, program frame x social context x dispositional phenotype, were tested.
Three-way interactions were found for the dispositional phenotypes of depression and hostility with social context and program content/frame. In predominantly Hispanic/Latino schools, larger program effects were observed for high depressed and high hostile youth in both the collectivist and individualist framed programs. In culturally mixed schools, prevention effects were greatest for low depressed and low hostile youth, especially in the individualist framed program. In culturally mixed schools, there may have been a negative treatment effect for both programs among adolescents scoring high on depression and hostility.
Prevention program effects can vary by combination of program content, social setting, and individual dispositional characteristics. The results suggest that prevention program design and implementation should be sensitive to population characteristics at both the individual and sociocultural levels.
以学校为基础的吸烟预防项目有时会以意想不到的方式失败。本研究检验了以下假设:社会/文化背景和个体性格特征都可能与项目内容相互作用,从而产生具有潜在可预测性的可变效果。
来自24所文化多元或主要为西班牙裔/拉丁裔的中学(N = 3157名六年级学生)的学生接受了多元文化集体主义框架的社会影响(SI)项目、个人主义框架的SI项目或对照条件。测试了三元线性和非线性相互作用,即项目框架×社会背景×性格表型。
发现抑郁和敌意的性格表型与社会背景和项目内容/框架之间存在三元相互作用。在主要为西班牙裔/拉丁裔的学校中,集体主义和个人主义框架项目对高抑郁和高敌意的青少年都观察到了更大的项目效果。在文化混合的学校中,预防效果对低抑郁和低敌意的青少年最为显著,尤其是在个人主义框架项目中。在文化混合的学校中,对于抑郁和敌意得分高的青少年,这两个项目可能都有负面的治疗效果。
预防项目的效果可能因项目内容、社会环境和个体性格特征的组合而有所不同。结果表明,预防项目的设计和实施应在个体和社会文化层面上对人群特征保持敏感。