• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大猩猩的图像评分

Image scoring in great apes.

作者信息

Russell Yvan I, Call Josep, Dunbar Robin I M

机构信息

British Academy Centenary Research Project, School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2008 May;78(1):108-11. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2007.10.009
PMID:18068313
Abstract

'Image scoring' occurs when person A monitors the giving behaviour of person B towards person C. We tested for 'image scoring' in chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans. Subjects passively observed two types of incident: (i) a 'nice' person gave grapes to a human beggar, and (ii) a 'nasty' person refused to give. The subject witnessed both incidents in succession (but was unable to obtain the grapes). Shortly after, the ape had an opportunity to approach one or both human actors (nice/nasty), both of whom were now sitting side-by-side holding grapes. However, neither human offered their grapes if approached. The subject's expectation of which human was more likely to offer food was measured by comparing the proportion of time that subjects spent near each person. Chimpanzees (n=17) spent significantly more time at the 'nice' window compared to 'nasty'. Also, preference for 'nasty' declined as trials progressed. Results for other apes were not significant.

摘要

当A观察B对C的给予行为时,就会出现“形象评分”。我们对黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩和猩猩进行了“形象评分”测试。实验对象被动地观察了两种事件:(i)一个“友善”的人给了一个人类乞丐葡萄,以及(ii)一个“讨厌”的人拒绝给予。实验对象依次目睹了这两种事件(但无法获得葡萄)。不久之后,猿类有机会接近其中一个或两个人类参与者(友善的/讨厌的),这两个人现在并排坐着拿着葡萄。然而,如果被接近,两个人都不会主动提供葡萄。通过比较实验对象在每个人旁边花费的时间比例,来衡量他们对哪个更有可能提供食物的人类的预期。与“讨厌”的人相比,黑猩猩(n = 17)在“友善”的窗口花费的时间明显更多。此外,随着试验的进行,对“讨厌”的人的偏好下降。其他猿类的结果不显著。

相似文献

1
Image scoring in great apes.大猩猩的图像评分
Behav Processes. 2008 May;78(1):108-11. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
2
Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.大猩猩(西部大猩猩、婆罗洲猩猩、倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩)之间的代币转移:物种差异、手势请求和互惠交换。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):375-84. doi: 10.1037/a0017253.
3
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility.大猩猩(黑猩猩、红毛猩猩、倭黑猩猩和大猩猩)在反向 contingency 任务中的表现:食物数量和食物可见性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):60-70. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.60.
4
Direct and indirect reputation formation in nonhuman great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens).非人类的大型猿类(倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、红毛猩猩)和人类儿童(智人)中直接和间接声誉的形成。
J Comp Psychol. 2013 Feb;127(1):63-75. doi: 10.1037/a0028929. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
5
The limits of endowment effects in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus).大型猿类(矮黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、红毛猩猩)禀赋效应的局限性
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Nov;125(4):436-45. doi: 10.1037/a0024516. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
6
Does early care affect joint attention in great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Pongo abelii, Pongo pygmaeus, Gorilla gorilla)?早期照料会影响大猩猩(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩、婆罗洲猩猩、西部大猩猩)的共同注意吗?
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):334-41. doi: 10.1037/a0015840.
7
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.大猩猩(黑猩猩、红毛猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩)在反向奖励 contingency 任务 II 中的表现:向新数量的转移、长期保持以及数量比率的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):204-12. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204.
8
Great apes track hidden objects after changes in the objects' position and in subject's orientation.大型猿类会在物体位置和主体方向发生变化后追踪隐藏的物体。
Am J Primatol. 2010 Apr;72(4):349-59. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20790.
9
Great apes select tools on the basis of their rigidity.大猩猩根据工具的硬度来选择工具。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):409-22. doi: 10.1037/a0019296.
10
The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task.倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)、黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和红毛猩猩(Pongo pygmaeus)在两种版本的物体选择任务中的表现。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):304-9. doi: 10.1037/a0016222.

引用本文的文献

1
Tonkean macaques do not prefer the helper or the hinderer in the hill paradigm.豚尾猕猴在山丘范式中并不偏爱帮助者或阻碍者。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Aug 27;12(8):250488. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250488. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Do dogs form reputations of humans? No effect of age after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation.狗会形成对人类的看法吗?在给予食物的情境中,间接和直接体验后年龄没有影响。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Jun 28;28(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01967-w.
3
Empirical challenges from the comparative and developmental literature to the Shared Intentionality Theory - a review of alternative data on recursive mind reading, prosociality, imitation and cumulative culture.
比较与发展文献对共享意向性理论提出的实证挑战——关于递归心理解读、亲社会性、模仿和累积文化的替代数据综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 13;14:1157137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157137. eCollection 2023.
4
Seeing social interactions.观察社会互动。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Dec;27(12):1165-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
5
Impact of the Dog-Human Bond on Canine Social Evaluation: Attachment Predicts Preference toward Prosocial Actors.犬类与人类的亲密关系对犬类社会评价的影响:依恋关系预示着对亲社会行为者的偏好。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 1;13(15):2480. doi: 10.3390/ani13152480.
6
Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation.狼和狗在食物给予情境中通过间接和直接经验,无法像人类一样形成声誉。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 17;17(8):e0271590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271590. eCollection 2022.
7
Chimpanzees consider freedom of choice in their evaluation of social action.黑猩猩在评估社会行为时会考虑选择的自由。
Biol Lett. 2022 Feb;18(2):20210502. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0502. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
8
The psychological foundations of reputation-based cooperation.基于声誉的合作的心理学基础。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200287. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0287. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
Investigating Indirect and Direct Reputation Formation in Asian Elephants ().研究亚洲象中间接和直接声誉形成() 。 (原文括号部分为空,译文保留括号)
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 8;11:604372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604372. eCollection 2020.
10
Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?狗会在人类帮助的情况下偷听人类的互动吗?
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 26;15(8):e0237373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237373. eCollection 2020.