• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究亚洲象中间接和直接声誉形成() 。 (原文括号部分为空,译文保留括号)

Investigating Indirect and Direct Reputation Formation in Asian Elephants ().

作者信息

Jim Hoi-Lam, Range Friederike, Marshall-Pescini Sarah, Dale Rachel, Plotnik Joshua M

机构信息

Domestication Lab, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 8;11:604372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604372. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604372
PMID:33519611
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7841644/
Abstract

Reputation is a key component in social interactions of group-living animals and appears to play a role in the establishment of cooperation. Animals can form a reputation of an individual by directly interacting with them or by observing them interact with a third party, i.e., eavesdropping. Elephants are an interesting taxon in which to investigate eavesdropping as they are highly cooperative, large-brained, long-lived terrestrial mammals with a complex social organisation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether captive Asian elephants () could form reputations of humans through indirect and/or direct experience in two different paradigms: (1) a cooperative string-pulling task and (2) a scenario requiring begging. Fourteen captive Asian elephants in Thailand participated in an experimental procedure that consisted of three parts: baseline, observation, and testing. In the observation phase, the subject saw a conspecific interact with two people-one cooperative/generous and one non-cooperative/selfish. The observer could then choose which person to approach in the test phase. The elephants were tested in a second session 2-5 days later. We found no support for the hypothesis that elephants can form reputations of humans through indirect or direct experience, but these results may be due to challenges with experimental design rather than a lack of capacity. We discuss how the results may be due to a potential lack of ecological validity in this study and the difficulty of assessing motivation and attentiveness in elephants. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of designing future experiments that account for the elephants' use of multimodal sensory information in their decision-making.

摘要

声誉是群居动物社会互动的关键组成部分,似乎在合作的建立中发挥作用。动物可以通过直接与个体互动或观察其与第三方的互动(即偷听)来形成对该个体的声誉。大象是一个有趣的分类群,适合研究偷听行为,因为它们是高度合作、大脑发达、寿命长且社会组织复杂的陆生哺乳动物。本研究的目的是调查圈养的亚洲象是否可以通过两种不同范式中的间接和/或直接经验来形成对人类的声誉:(1)合作拉绳任务和(2)乞讨场景。泰国的14头圈养亚洲象参与了一个由三个部分组成的实验程序:基线、观察和测试。在观察阶段,受试大象看到一个同种个体与两个人互动——一个合作/慷慨,另一个不合作/自私。然后,观察者可以在测试阶段选择接近哪个人。大象在2至5天后的第二阶段进行测试。我们没有找到支持大象可以通过间接或直接经验形成对人类声誉这一假设的证据,但这些结果可能是由于实验设计的挑战而非能力不足。我们讨论了结果可能如何归因于本研究中潜在的生态效度不足以及评估大象动机和注意力的困难。此外,我们强调了设计未来实验的重要性,这些实验要考虑到大象在决策过程中对多模态感官信息的利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/792ab2426563/fpsyg-11-604372-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/d5ab55e3ee62/fpsyg-11-604372-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/1a16bf7a2e0b/fpsyg-11-604372-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/e139cf984206/fpsyg-11-604372-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/850176db808b/fpsyg-11-604372-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/d32e794ac68e/fpsyg-11-604372-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/792ab2426563/fpsyg-11-604372-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/d5ab55e3ee62/fpsyg-11-604372-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/1a16bf7a2e0b/fpsyg-11-604372-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/e139cf984206/fpsyg-11-604372-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/850176db808b/fpsyg-11-604372-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/d32e794ac68e/fpsyg-11-604372-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f1e/7841644/792ab2426563/fpsyg-11-604372-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating Indirect and Direct Reputation Formation in Asian Elephants ().研究亚洲象中间接和直接声誉形成() 。 (原文括号部分为空,译文保留括号)
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 8;11:604372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604372. eCollection 2020.
2
Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation.狼和狗在食物给予情境中通过间接和直接经验,无法像人类一样形成声誉。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 17;17(8):e0271590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271590. eCollection 2022.
3
Testing the Effectiveness of the "Smelly" Elephant Repellent in Controlled Experiments in Semi-Captive Asian and African Savanna Elephants.在半圈养的亚洲和非洲草原象的对照实验中测试“臭”象驱避剂的有效性。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;13(21):3334. doi: 10.3390/ani13213334.
4
Males have more aggressive and less sociable personalities than females in semi-captive Asian elephants.在半圈养的亚洲象中,雄性比雌性具有更具攻击性和更少的社交性的个性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 25;9(1):2668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39915-7.
5
Serological study on brucellosis in captive elephants () and stray dogs in North Thailand.泰国北部圈养大象()和流浪狗布鲁氏菌病的血清学研究。 注:括号内内容原文缺失,翻译时保留原样。
Vet World. 2020 Sep;13(9):1992-1997. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.1992-1997. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
6
Evaluating the personality structure of semi-captive Asian elephants living in their natural habitat.评估生活在自然栖息地的半圈养亚洲象的性格结构。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Feb 7;5(2):172026. doi: 10.1098/rsos.172026. eCollection 2018 Feb.
7
Assessing the Psychological Priorities for Optimising Captive Asian Elephant () Welfare.评估优化圈养亚洲象福利的心理优先事项
Animals (Basel). 2019 Dec 23;10(1):39. doi: 10.3390/ani10010039.
8
Subclinical infection of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Thailand with elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus.泰国圈养亚洲象(Elephas maximus)中存在象疱疹病毒亚临床感染。
Arch Virol. 2020 Feb;165(2):397-401. doi: 10.1007/s00705-019-04469-6. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
9
Investigating changes within the handling system of the largest semi-captive population of Asian elephants.调查最大半圈养亚洲象种群处理系统内的变化。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):e0209701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209701. eCollection 2019.
10
Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation.大象真的永远不会忘记吗?我们对大象记忆的了解以及进一步调查的呼吁。
Learn Behav. 2025 Mar;53(1):44-64. doi: 10.3758/s13420-024-00655-y. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Do dogs form reputations of humans? No effect of age after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation.狗会形成对人类的看法吗?在给予食物的情境中,间接和直接体验后年龄没有影响。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Jun 28;28(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01967-w.
2
Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation.狼和狗在食物给予情境中通过间接和直接经验,无法像人类一样形成声誉。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 17;17(8):e0271590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271590. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Power of a randomization test in a single case multiple baseline AB design.随机化检验在单病例多项基线 AB 设计中的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0228355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228355. eCollection 2020.
2
Wolves and dogs recruit human partners in the cooperative string-pulling task.狼和狗在合作拉绳任务中招募人类伙伴。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 26;9(1):17591. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53632-1.
3
The use of a human's location and social cues by Asian elephants in an object-choice task.亚洲象在物体选择任务中使用人类的位置和社交线索。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Nov;22(6):907-915. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01283-0. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
4
Elephants have a nose for quantity.大象对数量有嗅觉。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 18;116(25):12566-12571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818284116. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
5
Wolves lead and dogs follow, but they both cooperate with humans.狼为首,狗随后,但都与人类合作。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 7;9(1):3796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40468-y.
6
The Origin of Social Evaluation, Social Eavesdropping, Reputation Formation, Image Scoring or What You Will.社会评价、社会偷听、声誉形成、形象评分或诸如此类事物的起源。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 14;7:1772. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01772. eCollection 2016.
7
Tracking the evolutionary origins of dog-human cooperation: the "Canine Cooperation Hypothesis".探寻狗与人类合作的进化起源:“犬类合作假说”
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 15;5:1582. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01582. eCollection 2014.
8
Influence of group size on the success of wolves hunting bison.群体规模对狼捕猎野牛成功率的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112884. eCollection 2014.
9
Elephants can determine ethnicity, gender, and age from acoustic cues in human voices.大象可以通过人类声音中的声学线索来判断种族、性别和年龄。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 8;111(14):5433-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321543111. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
10
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.