Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Dec 18;4:66. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-66.
Numerous studies have examined the association between the surrounding neighborhood environment and physical activity levels in adolescents. Many of these studies use a road network buffer or Euclidean distance buffer around an adolescent's home to represent the appropriate geographic area for study (i.e., neighborhood). However, little empirical research has examined the appropriate buffer size to use when defining this area and there is little consistency across published research as to the buffer size used. In this study, 909 12th grade adolescent girls of diverse racial and geographic backgrounds were asked to report their perceptions of an easy walking distance and a convenient driving distance. These two criterions are often used as the basis for defining one's neighborhood.The mean easy walking distance in minutes reported by adolescent girls was 14.8 minutes (SD = 8.7). The mean convenient driving distance in minutes reported was 17.9 minutes (SD = 10.8). Nested linear multivariate regression models found significant differences in reported 'easy walking distance' across race and BMI. White adolescents reported on average almost 2 minutes longer for an easy walking distance compared to African American adolescents. Adolescents who were not overweight or at risk for overweight reported almost 2 minutes fewer for an easy walking distance relative to those who were overweight or at risk for overweight. Significant differences by urban status were found in the reported 'convenient driving distance'. Those living in non-urban areas reported on average 3.2 minutes more driving time as convenient compared to those living in urban areas. Very little variability in reported walking and driving distances was explained by the predictors used in the models (i.e., age, race, BMI, physical activity levels, urban status and SES).This study suggests the use of a 0.75 mile buffer to represent an older female adolescent's neighborhood, which can be accessed through walking. However, determining the appropriate area inclusive of car travel should be tailored to the geographic location of the adolescent since non-urban adolescents are willing to spend more time driving to destinations. Further research is needed to understand the substantial variability across adolescent perceptions of an easy walking and convenient driving distance.
许多研究都考察了青少年周围邻里环境与身体活动水平之间的关系。这些研究中的许多都使用青少年家庭周围的道路网络缓冲区或欧几里得距离缓冲区来表示研究的适当地理区域(即邻里)。然而,很少有实证研究检验用于定义该区域的适当缓冲区大小,而且在已发表的研究中,用于定义该区域的缓冲区大小也不一致。在这项研究中,909 名来自不同种族和地理背景的 12 年级少女被要求报告她们对步行距离和驾车距离的感知。这两个标准通常被用作定义邻里的基础。少女报告的平均步行距离为 14.8 分钟(SD=8.7)。报告的平均方便驾车距离为 17.9 分钟(SD=10.8)。嵌套线性多元回归模型发现,报告的“易步行距离”在种族和 BMI 上存在显著差异。与非裔美国青少年相比,白人青少年报告的易步行距离平均长近 2 分钟。与超重或超重风险的青少年相比,体重正常或超重风险较低的青少年报告的易步行距离平均少近 2 分钟。在报告的“方便驾车距离”上发现了城市地位的显著差异。与居住在城市地区的青少年相比,居住在非城市地区的青少年报告的平均驾车时间方便了 3.2 分钟。在模型中使用的预测因子(即年龄、种族、BMI、身体活动水平、城市地位和 SES)几乎无法解释报告的步行和驾驶距离的差异。本研究建议使用 0.75 英里的缓冲区来代表年长女性青少年的邻里,该缓冲区可以通过步行进入。然而,由于非城市地区的青少年愿意花更多的时间开车去目的地,因此确定包括汽车旅行在内的适当区域应该根据青少年的地理位置进行调整。需要进一步的研究来了解青少年对易步行和方便驾车距离的感知的巨大差异。