Kosinski Mark, Janagap Carmela C, Gajria Kavita, Schein Jeff
Quality Metric, Inc., Lincoln, Rhode Island 02865, USA.
Clin Ther. 2007;29 Suppl:2562-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.001.
Patients with chronic pain often experience significant disruptions in sleep. A potential benefit of treatment aimed at pain relief is improved quality of sleep in patients with chronic pain.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory (CPSI) and provide preliminary evidence of its construct validity in assessing sleep problems among patients with chronic pain.
Data came from four 12-week, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of chronic low back pain and osteo-arthritis of the hip or knee. CPSI data were collected at baseline and 12 weeks. The 5 CPSI items measured trouble falling asleep (CPSI1), needing sleep medication (CPSI2), awakened by pain during the night (CPSI3) and in the morning (CPSI4), and overall quality of sleep (CPSI5) on a 100-mm visual analog scale. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the underlying dimensionality and structure of the CPSI scales. The known-groups method was used to assess validity by comparing CPSI item scores across groups of patients known to differ in the presence and severity of sleep problems as measured by the Physical Dependence Questionnaire.
A total of 2674 patients were included in the study (mean age, 57.6 years; 61.0% female; 80.2% white). The majority of the patients were treated for chronic pain related to osteoarthritis of the hip or knee (n=2294). Findings revealed a single sleep problems index can be scored from 3 of the 5 CPSI items (CPSI1, CPSI3, and CPSI4). All 3 items attributed sleep problems to pain, with high factor loadings (>0.80) and a high internal consistency (>0.90). Moderate to high correlations (r >or= 0.50) between CPSI items demonstrated convergent validity, and weak correlations (r<0.50) with other health-related scales (the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteo-arthritis Index and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey) demonstrated discriminant validity. All CPSI items showed greater ability to discriminate and respond to changes in the presence and severity of sleep problems than the other health-related scales.
CPSI items showed good construct validity, and the results support the scoring of a reliable single index from 3 of the 5 CPSI items that all attributed sleep problems to pain.
慢性疼痛患者常常经历睡眠的显著紊乱。旨在缓解疼痛的治疗的一个潜在益处是改善慢性疼痛患者的睡眠质量。
本研究的目的是评估慢性疼痛睡眠量表(CPSI)的心理测量特性,并提供其在评估慢性疼痛患者睡眠问题方面的结构效度的初步证据。
数据来自四项针对慢性下腰痛以及髋或膝骨关节炎的为期12周的多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。CPSI数据在基线和12周时收集。CPSI的5个项目在100毫米视觉模拟量表上测量入睡困难(CPSI1)、需要睡眠药物(CPSI2)、夜间(CPSI3)和早晨(CPSI4)因疼痛醒来以及总体睡眠质量(CPSI5)。进行探索性和验证性因素分析以评估CPSI量表的潜在维度和结构。已知组方法用于通过比较已知在睡眠问题的存在和严重程度上存在差异的患者组之间的CPSI项目得分来评估效度,睡眠问题通过身体依赖问卷进行测量。
本研究共纳入2674例患者(平均年龄57.6岁;61.0%为女性;80.2%为白人)。大多数患者接受了与髋或膝骨关节炎相关的慢性疼痛治疗(n = 2294)。研究结果显示,可从5个CPSI项目中的3个(CPSI1、CPSI3和CPSI4)得出一个单一的睡眠问题指数。所有3个项目都将睡眠问题归因于疼痛,具有高因素负荷(>0.80)和高内部一致性(>0.90)。CPSI项目之间的中度至高度相关性(r≥0.50)表明了收敛效度,与其他健康相关量表(西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数以及36项简短健康调查)的弱相关性(r<0.50)表明了区分效度。所有CPSI项目在区分和响应睡眠问题的存在和严重程度变化方面比其他健康相关量表表现出更强的能力。
CPSI项目显示出良好的结构效度,结果支持从5个CPSI项目中的3个得出一个可靠的单一指数,这3个项目都将睡眠问题归因于疼痛。